The Source and Value of the "Mysteries"
by H. S. Olcott
[From The Theosophist, January 1888, pages 240-48]
That MUO, to shut the lips, to keep silence, is the Greek root of
the word "Mysteries," everyone readily admits; but to signify
what was to be kept silent by those who were admitted "behind the
veil" of initiation, is now and has ever been impossible save to
initiates.
The lampooners and denunciators of our time have as little
succeeded in shaking the faith of believers in the reality and
value of mystical initiation, as did their precursors in the
olden times that of their believing contemporaries. It has been
simply the array of conjecture against experience, of surmise
against knowledge. The wise have had but a feeling of
contemptuous pity for the army of critics whose conclusions have
rested upon wholly mistaken premises, and whose verdict has been
colored by exaggerated prejudice and foolish mistrust.
There is not an example recorded of anyone speaking irreverently
of the course of initiation after having passed through it. On
the other hand, the most divine characters in history who have
been so blessed, have unanimously expressed their joy at having
entered "The Path" and pursued it bravely to the end. Their
testimony is that, until man has had this evolution, he cannot
conceive of the nature of truth or the possibilities latent in
humanity.
"Happy," says Pindar, who passed through the august mysteries of
Eleusis, "is he who has beheld them, and descends beneath the
hollow earth. He knows the end, he knows the divine origin of
life." As, in Pantanjali's system of Yoga, the pupil goes
gradually onward and upward, from the state of animal man,
through the stages of self-mastery and psychic development, until
he flowers into the true Yogi and unites his consciousness with
the infinite, so in all the mystical schools of Greece, Rome,
Egypt, and other trans-Himalayan countries, he had to pass
through a like education.
Porphyry tells us that his master, Plotinus, was so fortunate as
to have six times during his life experienced this blessed union,
while he himself had done so but twice. Human knowledge, he
avers, has three ascending steps: opinion, science, and
illumination.
The whole body of scientific critics, who have discussed the
subject of the mysteries ab extra, illustrate the first category;
they dogmatize upon a mere hypothesis. The second includes all
seekers after and realizers of psychic powers, all phenomenalists
mesmeric, mediumistic, hypnotic, somnambulant, yogic. Of the
latter, all who acquire one or more siddhis and have gone no
higher. The third group embraces the illuminated seers, sages,
and adepts, in their grades above grades, to the top of the
mystical hierarchy.
A modern writer (in The New American Cyclopedia, XII, 75) says
that the mysteries being "founded on the adoration of nature (!),
the forces and phenomena of which were conceived by the
imagination and transformed into the characters of the mythology,
they appealed to the eye rather than to the reason." If any proof
were needed of his critical incompetence, we have it here. He
does not seem to comprehend that the
... rites of purification and expiation, of sacrifices and
processions, of ecstatic or orgiastic songs and dances, of
nocturnal festivals fit to impress the imagination, and of
spectacles designed to excite the most diverse emotions, terror
and trust, sorrow and joy, hope and despair ...
were but the incidents of the first threshold, tests to try the
persistency, courage, unselfishness, purity, and intuitive
capacity of the beginner. The calm, the peace, the inward
elevation, the growth of spiritual insight, the majestic
expansion of the petty ego or ahankara, toward universal
consciousness, he does not picture to himself.
Would the blaze, the awe, and glitter of such ceremonials as
shock the very core of the neophyte's being, extort from such
masterful sages as Pythagoras, Plato, Iamblichos, Proclus, and
Porphyry the reverently appreciative testimonies they have left
on record? Those spectacular shows of the antechamber were
designed, according to Iamblichos,
... to free us from licentious passions, by gratifying the
sight, and at the same time vanquishing all evil thought, though
the awful sanctity with which these rites were accompanied.
The plan was the very reverse of that of the would-be adept, who
flees from mankind to the jungle and cave, where he may not see
the objects that arouse evil passions.
In the mysteries, the neophyte had to see the most voluptuous
female forms, and expose himself to their most seductive
blandishments; had to look, fasting, upon the most luscious
banquets; had to see that by putting forth his hand he could
grasp incalculable treasures; had to witness the seeming triumph
of his bitterest foe over those in whom he was most interested;
had to see manifold phenomena apparently resulting from the
universe of powers, seemingly realizable by himself, without much
effort; and yet so keep his soul-mastery as to neither give way
to lust, appetite, avarice, hatred, revenge, nor vanity.
In the course of his trials, he would be made to think himself in
peril of life from fire, water, lightning, earthquakes,
precipices, savage beasts, assassins, and other catastrophes, yet
all the while is expected to preserve an equal serenity and
dauntless pluck.
This was the price exacted in exchange for the attainment of
godhood, the ordeal for the discovery of the candidate's innate
trustworthiness; this was initiation.
What wonder that the secret of the mysteries has been inviolably
kept by initiates through all times and ages! To men of such
stuff as that, the feeble chatter, the wretched persecutions, the
"toy thunders" of bigotry, the physical anguish of
torture-chambers; all that an ignorant brutal society could visit
upon them to wrest their ineffable secret from their lips, were
absurdly ineffectual. Where can we find a grander embodiment of
this idea than in the story of the discomfiture of Mara, dread
sovereign of evil, by our Lord Buddha, under the sacred tree at
Gaya?
In this splendid epic is depicted the whole sequence of
initiations accredited to the mysteries of Eleusis, Samothrace,
Lemnos, Isis and Osiris, Mithra, Orpheus, Dionysos, Scandinavia,
and the trans-Atlantic Mayas, Quiches and Peruvians. As there is
but one secret of life, there could never have been more than one
channel for attaining the highest knowledge of it.
If the preliminary ceremonials took on the local coloring of
mythologies, there was but one truth hidden "behind the veil."
Those who, in our own days, have been blessed with personal
relations with the "Wise Men of the East," have found them
teaching an identical philosophy, whether they were externally
Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Jew, Parsi, or Mussulman as to social
environment and nominal caste. And what they are now teaching is
the same as that which was taught to students in all countries,
at all preceding epochs.
It is for the purpose of illustrating this fact that occultists
take so much interest in deciphering old temple inscriptions,
poring over old manuscripts, studying old symbols carven on
crumbling ruins, and trying to piece together the fragments of
books which the vanished fraternities of Asia, Africa, Europe,
and America, succeeded in saving for us their posterity, when
they fell victims to the cruel violence of their persecutors.
This is the reason why it is so well worth our while to read the
Egyptian books of Hermes, the hieroglyphs in the ruined temples
of Khemi, the fragmentary archives of the Rosicrucians, the
poetry of the Sufis, the weird sagas of Northern Europe, the
mural inscriptions of Central America, and to analyze and
synthesize the folklore, legends, and folk songs of many lands.
Those who devote themselves to this research are doing it less
for their own profit than to collate for the benefit of the
thinking public a mass of proof of the eternal unity of esoteric
truth.
As the geographer traces the dripping cloud through a thousand
streams to the river and the sea, and from the sea back to the
sky, so do these investigators follow back the boundless ocean of
occult truth to its divine source, through multitudinous
wanderings of its branchlets among men.
It seems but a waste of energy to dispute as to the comparative
antiquity of the mysteries. The end of all the speculation and
research of the pandits and professors is that they can fix with
certainty no date for their beginning. Reaching a certain point,
they are forced to admit that beyond that conjecture alone is
possible.
The most practical issue is whether the ancient mysteries
subserved an immoral or a moral purpose, whether they were
designed for the education of students in physical sciences, for
supporting local religious beliefs, for enhancing the importance,
emoluments and prerogatives of priests, for the overthrow of old
and establishment of new theologies, or for the very purpose
stated by the sages named, and others who had received full
initiation.
Dr. Warburton admits, in his "Divine Legation of Moses," that
"the wisest and best men in the Pagan world are unanimous in
this; that the mysteries were instituted pure, and proposed the
noblest ends by the worthiest means."
The encyclopaedist above quoted also testifies that:
the Eleusinian were the most venerable of the mysteries, and in
every period of classical antiquity commanded the homage alike of
the most distinguished poets, philosophers, historians, and
statesmen.
Can anyone, then, believe that they were but a superior kind of
tamasha, such as are gotten up to excite the wonder of the
ignorant masses? Is it presumable that they could have been kept
up through successive generations, always winning the same praise
and arousing the same awe-begotten reverence in sober minds, if
they had been what our modern critics, our Welckers and Maurys,
our Magnussens, Vosses, Lobecks, and Prellers imagine, or, as
Tertullian and other Fathers of the Church try to imply, a
mixture of Christian and Pagan dogmas and ceremonies?
When one comes to look through the books written by these
worthies, one is struck with the actual ignorance accompanied by
hardy guessing, which all display. At the best, they seem but to
be looking at the subject from afar through the telescope of
conjecture, not even to be getting a peep from the threshold into
the vestibule of the sacred caverns.
Most exasperating of all is it to read such works as Tom Moore's
Epicurean, or A Day in Athens, and to see him first describing
the experiences of a neophyte who has passed through a series of
trials, the very recital of which shows how impossible it was to
ascribe them to trickery, and then, when the attempt is quite
useless, to try and make the reader believe them to have been
produced by a lot of stage machinery, such as might catch the
fancy of a theatrical audience.
One wishes, after reading such a book, that the author had been
either more clever himself or less ready to doubt the reader's
common sense. Either his neophyte never passed through such
scenes, or the author's attempt at explanation is transparently
absurd and childish. It reminds one of the endeavors of some
prejudiced Orientalists to cramp and crowd Aryan history and
literature into the iron frame of biblical chronology, and to
trace the families of mankind to three sons of Noah who never
existed.
The ancient mysteries, modern initiation, and all mystical
occupation rest upon the doctrine that man can never learn
through the bodily senses, the secrets of life and the problem of
the universe.
The eye, the ear, and all other organs of the body are but
avenues of perception of the gross physical world about us.
Mechanically adapted to our exterior environment, they have no
higher function than to record its impressions upon that lower
part of ourself which is built out of matter, and destined to
resolve into its elements, sooner or later. Reason is but the
analyst and synthesist of these impressions. Between it and
ultimate knowledge hangs numberless veils.
Man is a congeries of various "principles" some say three,
some four, some seven but whatever the correct number, all are
included between two extreme points, the one which is in contact
with the grossest, the other, with the most sublime,
consciousness.
So long as one's perceptions are restricted to sensuous
experiences, one's knowledge will be proportionately small; to
become truly wise, one must burst the bonds of illusion, tear
away the curtain of Maya, break the chains of passion, learn the
self and put it in command of our consciousness and our actions.
The neophyte is never in greater danger of falling a victim to
delusion than when he has subjected his grosser passions and
begun to develop his psychic sight, hearing, and touch. He is
like the newborn babe getting its first lessons of cisuterine
life, grasping at the pretty silver moon, clutching at fire and
lamp, miscalculating distances, tottering upon its feeble legs.
He has forced himself into the vestibule of the astral world, as
yet unprepared to understand his surroundings, ignorant of his
latent powers of mastery and insight. If he gets himself out of
the body and attempts phantasmal excursions, he is like the
nestling trying its baby wings. "The viewless races of the air,"
the sprites of the elemental world, rush about him in all sorts
of fantastic shapes, some alluring, some terrifying; the larvae,
or undissolved astral bodies D'Assier's "posthumous phantoms"
of human dead persons, float past and eddy around, like
corpses in river-currents.
Then his inner ear opens to the mysterious sounds of this phantom
world, and he recoils in affright from the awful tales, the
groans and sighs, and other things he hears. Pictures impressed
by vivid human thought upon the earth's astral envelope, and
fresh ones created by his own untaught imagination, surround him
with an unreal world, which yet has to him the actual semblance
of reality. He is, as Patanjali describes it, under the
influence of the "local gods." Now is his time to acquire psychic
"science," to learn the laws of this middle region, and see
through all illusions.
If he is under a guru's care and supremely foolish is he who
neglects this preliminary he will be watched over and looked
after, as the tender mother cares for her child. As the teacher
eagerly helps the willing scholar to master the difficulties of
his textbooks, so this greater master is ready to meet halfway
the aspiring chela who tries, as the maxim of initiation
inculcates.
But there are deeper mysteries of the penetralia which are never
revealed by the initiator to the neophyte; they must be reached
by his unaided effort; for they are personal, pertaining to
absolute knowledge, and never capable of communication by third
parties. As no description, however graphic, can convey the idea
of visible nature to the man born blind, so no help can be given
to understand the higher secrets save to him who has forced open
the eyes of his inner self and uncovered its senses.
When this point is reached, one has arrived at the fifth of the
seven stages of the fourth and last division of Yoga; Illusion
has faded away like a mist, and the naked loveliness of Truth is
exposed. But, while many attempt, few attain this final
development.
There are fewer potential adepts in an epoch than the superficial
imagine. The fate of those who tread this dizzy precipice of
wisdom with weak and faltering steps may be readily inferred.
What happens to the dizzy-brained and slippery-footed alpine
climber? His brain turns, and he falls headlong into the chasm,
with a last shriek and a clutching at the air.
So, too, falls the rash postulant who has ventured to force
nature prematurely. Madame Blavatsky, whose eloquent and
striking remarks upon the whole subject of the mysteries should
be universally read, quotes from the Talmud, the story of four
Tanaim, who enter the garden of delights, i.e., present
themselves for initiation:
According to the teaching of our holy masters, the names
of the four who entered the garden of delights, are: Ben Asai,
Ben Zorna, Acher, and Rabbi Akiba ... Ben Asai looked and
lost his sight. Ben Zorna looked and lost his reason. Acher
made depredations in the plantation (i.e., mixed up the whole)
and failed. But Akiba, who had entered in peace, came out of it
in peace, for the saint whose name is blessed had said, "This old
man is worthy of serving us with glory."
Isis Unveiled, II, 119
Observe the word "old." The implication here is that Akiba had
not foolishly exposed himself to lust-provoking "rites of
purification" until the heat of young blood was gone.
In his most admirable work, Maimonides, the Hebrew adept, says
that:
... it was considered inadvisable to teach it to young men; nay,
it is impossible for them to comprehend it, on account of the
heat of their blood and the flame of youth, which confuses their
minds; that heat which causes all the disorder, must first
disappear; they must have become moderate and settled, humble in
their hearts, and subdued in their temperament; only then will
they be able to arrive at the highest perception of God, that is,
the study of Metaphysics, which is called Maaseh Mercabhah ...
Rabbi Jocharian said to Rabbi Eleazar, "Come, I will teach you
Maaseh Mercabhah."
The reply was. "I am not yet old," or in other words I still
perceive in myself the hot blood and the rashness of youth. You
learn from this that, in addition to the above-named qualities, a
certain age is also required. How, then, could any person speak
on those metaphysical themes in the presence of ordinary people,
of children, and of women?
Guide of the Perplexed, Trubner and Co., London.
Patanjali tells us that the
... local deities will assail such a Yogi [one who is only in
the rudimentary stage], and will endeavor to divert him from the
religious abstraction which he has attained, by bringing before
him sensual gratifications, or by exciting in his mind thoughts
of personal aggrandizement, but he should partake of these
gratifications without interest, for if these deities succeed in
exciting desire in the mind, he will be thrown back to all the
evils of future transmigrations.
The next European philosopher who applies himself to the study of
the mysteries, would do well to familiarize himself with the Yoga
Philosophy before committing himself to such jejune hypotheses as
were put forth by those who have been mentioned above.
But is there no recompense for those who fail in initiation
through miscalculation of their power to realize the ideal
psychic development? Certainly there is. The attainment of
perfection is but postponed to a future birth. Every preliminary
step in self-conquest and self-knowledge is so much experience
and developed power, stored up psychic energy, for the use of the
individuality in its next incarnation. The Divine Krishna
answers Arjuna, who had put this very question:
Doth not the fool who is found not standing in the path of Brahm,
and is thus, as it were, fallen between good and evil, like a
broken cloud, come to nothing?
Krishna says:
A man whose devotions have been broken off by death, having
enjoyed for an immensity of years the rewards of his virtues in
the regions above [This idea is developed by Mr. Sinnett in
Esoteric Buddhism.] at length is born again in some holy and
respectable family, or perhaps in the house of some learned Yogi
... Being thus born again, he is endued with the same degree of
application and advancement of his understanding that he held in
his former body, and here he begins again to labor for perfection
in devotion.
The Bhagavad-Gita, Lecture vii.
Thus we see that the ancient mysteries were but a school of
spiritual training and perfection in true wisdom; that the
preliminary qualification was the purification of the heart from
all sensual passions and false preconceptions; that, while the
hand of the master might lead the neophyte through the dangers of
the stage where, like the infant, he could not walk alone, he was
obliged, in the higher paths, to learn to guide and guard
himself, as the adult man has to do in ordinary life; that the
ultimate goal was the expansion of the self into infinite
existence and potentialities; and, lastly, that, however the
initial forms and ceremonies may have differed in appearance, an
identical aim was in view.
It is impossible to determine the priority of these occult
schools until our philologists and antiquarians have proved to us
where, if anywhere, was the cradle of the human race. If there
was such an evolutionary center, then there must the adept
guardians of mankind have first taught the way to the path.
Just now we are disputing whether India taught Egypt, and Egypt,
Scandinavia and Yucatan, or whether Egypt was the primal center,
or some other place. Finnur Magnusson attempts to trace a
connection between the mysteries and the legends of his Frozen
North, and certainly the sages embody an esoteric doctrine that
strikes the attention of every student of occultism, and that our
learned colleague, Mr. Bjerregaard, has begun to demonstrate in
these pages.
There is also in progress a sharp controversy between Prof. Max
Muller and other philologists as to whether the Aryan race came
from Scandinavia or Central Asia, and, as above remarked, until
this is determined, we need not discuss the priority of Northern,
Southern, or Eastern mysteries. If the first is true, then we
may well speculate as to why Apollonius and Pythagoras should
have come to India to find masters in arcane science, when Norway
was so much nearer.
That there are such teachers in each of the four quarters of the
earth, is more than suspected, and quite naturally, for it is
inconceivable when we know what adeptship and occultism are,
and what their relations to mankind in the mass that any
portion of the teeming earth should be left without those whose
help "that great orphan, Humanity," so desperately needs.
Consider the book of Augustus Le Plongeon, Sacred Mysteries Among
The Mayas and Quiches, 11,500 Years Ago: Their Relation to the
Sacred Mysteries of Egypt, Greece, Chaldea and India (New York,
1886) This book, noticed in our December issue, deserves the most
attentive study. It will be a shame to America if the
discoveries amid the ruins of Uxmal and Chichen-Itza, the result
of fourteen years of brave research, under the most trying
difficulties, by his wife and himself, should not be appreciated
at their enormous worth, as contributions to history.
One cannot even glance at the photographic and other
illustrations in the book without realizing the intimate
connection between the mystical schools of the two hemispheres.
The hieratic alphabets of Egypt and the ancient Mayax country are
placed side by side on the same page, and a look suffices to show
their substantial identity. What Champollion did for
Egyptological science, M. Le Plongeon seems to have done for
Mayatic archaeology.
If it is any compensation for him in his time of sadness
consequent upon the rebuffs given him where he had every right to
count upon honors and reward to know that his labor is
appreciated at least at Adyar, then let him know the fact.
Whether it should ultimately prove that the mysteries came to the
Eastern from the Western Hemisphere, or vice versa, does not
matter so much to us, personally, as the graver fact that he has
placed within our reach the unmistakable evidence that one
universal truth has been taught by an identical method, the world
over.
When I first read Stephens' Incidents of Travel in Central
America, Chiapas and Yucatan now many years ago I was
struck by the occult significance of the mural stuccos and
sculptured monuments in all the ruins he visited, among which may
be recognized a picture of the very act of imparting the most
divine of all mysteries to the neophyte, in the higher stage of
initiation.
I was amused just now, upon referring to the copy of this work in
the Adyar Library, to read of the perplexity and consternation
felt by the Christian priests upon seeing a delineation
admittedly far older than Christianity upon the altar-wall at
Palenque, of the adoration of the cross by ancient Quichean
hierophants. Says Stephens:
Our friends the padres, at the sight of it, immediately decided
that the old inhabitants of Palenque were Christians, and by
conclusions, which are sometimes called jumping, they fixed the
age of the buildings in the third century!
II, 347
These people have been on the "jump" all over the world, upon
being confronted with evidences of the prior existence of
emblems, ceremonies, fables and traditions, really the property
of the race, but imagined by them to be exclusively Christian.
The works of Stephens, Le Plongeon, Dessaix, and other Central
American explorers should be read together, if one would realize
the relative importance of the conclusions reached severally by
these authors.
Stephens does not explain the meaning of the cross at Palenque,
nor that of the scenes represented pictorially and otherwise in
the ruins, but says probably the hieroglyphics tell it all.
That they do so, Le Plongeon now proves by discovering the
Mayatic and Quichean alphabet and reading the tablets. We learn
from him that that most mystical emblem, the cross, was
associated there as in Egypt, Babylon, Assyria, India, Chaldea,
Phoenicia, Britain, and Scandinavia, with the ceremonies of
initiation. It was to those ancient Americans the symbol of
rejuvenescence and freedom from physical suffering. In the
Bacchic and Eleusinian mysteries it was placed on the breast of
the initiate after his "new birth" was accomplished.
Exoterically, it was associated in Mayax with the appearance, at
a certain period of the year, of the constellation of the
southern cross in the perpendicular position above the line of
their southern horizon the sure harbinger of the rainy season.
Says Le Plongeon:
The mode of initiation, the use of the same symbols, with an
identical signification ascribed to them, by peoples living so
far apart, whose customs and manners were so unlike, whose
religion, so far at least as external practices were concerned,
differed so widely, show that these mysteries originated with one
people, and were carried to and promulgated among the others. As
we do not find mentioned anywhere that they originated either
with the Egyptians, Chaldees, or Hindus, and we have seen that
their primitive traditions have been derived from the history of
the early rulers of Mayax, is it not natural that we should look
for the institution of the mysteries among the Mayas, since we
find the same mysterious symbols, used by the initiates in all
the other countries, carved on the walls of the temples of their
gods, and the palaces of their kings? Their history may afford
the clue to the original meaning of said symbols, as their
language has given us the true signification of the words used by
the celebrating priest to dismiss the initiates in the Eleusinian
mysteries, or by the Brahmins at the end of their religious
ceremonies, and as it has revealed the so long hidden mystery of
the mystical tau.
(The Tau is the "Nature Cross," or curx ansata, of Egypt, which
occupies the central place in the mystical seal of the
Theosophical Society, and signifies the same thing as the
six-pointed star, or sri jantara, of the Aryan, Chaldean, and
Judaic secret doctrine.)
I am not sure that I am quite prepared to concur with M. Le
Plongeon in the conjecture that the symbolical degrees of the
world's course of mystical initiation, but preserve certain
historical incidents in the life-history of the Royal House of
Mayax, though he certainly brings together, with patient
erudition, a number of facts going to show that the tragedies in
question may have supplied the basis for certain of our Oriental
mythologies, if even they were not the very scenes represented in
the preparatory rites of the Eleusinian and Osiric mysteries.
It is curious to note that the ancient records of Mayax cantain
an account of the fearful cataclysm in which the sinful people of
Atlantis and their whole continent were engulfed in one day and
night.
The description being "identical with that given by the
Egyptians," he adds that "nearly all the nations living on the
Western continent have kept the tradition of it." There is a
passage in the Volus-pa, in the "Visions of Valla," which may
covertly refer to this Atlantic cataclysm, or be, as Mr.
Bjerregaard views it (see The Theosophist, VIII, February and
July 1887), a figurative representation of the ultimate triumph
of good over evil. It runs thus:
The sun turns to darkness, earth sinks into the deep, the bright
stars vanish from out the heavens, fume and flame rage together,
the lefty blaze plays against the very heavens.
True, this is written in the future tense, yet it is not
absolutely certain that it was not the veiled narrative of a past
event. The divinely majestic poem recounts the "first war in the
world," when "they speared gold-weig (gold-draught), and burnt
her in the High One's Hall; thrice was she burnt, and thrice
reborn, though still she lives," but Mr. Bjerregaard tells us
that "this myth is entirely lost."
I wish he would compare notes with M. Le Plongeon who is
living in the same city with him and see whether the
revelations of the mural records of Mayax throw light upon the
mystical epopee of his native land. It is a point of great
moment to decide. It may help to unravel the tangled skein of
the "Mysteries."
|