The Light of the Russian Soul: A Personal Memoir of Early Russian Theosophy

The Light of the Russian Soul: A Personal Memoir of Early Russian Theosophy

By Elena F. Pisareva

Originally printed in the SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2008 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Pisareva, Elena F. "The Light of the Russian Soul: A Personal Memoir of Early Russian Theosophy." Quest  96.5 (SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2008):171-174.

The following extracts are taken from a new translation by George M. Young of a never before published account of Theosophy in Russia before and until the Russian Revolution. The author, Elena Pisareva, focuses especially on the early leader of Russian Theosophists, Anna Kamensky, some of whose activities these extracts describe. 

NINA GERNET DESERVES TO BE CONSIDERED the first pioneer of Theosophy in Russia. She traveled abroad annually, attended most European Theosophical congresses, became acquainted with Annie Besant, and at great personal risk smuggled forbidden Theosophical literature into Russia. The main repository for this literature was in St. Petersburg, in the residence of a childhood friend, Anna Kamensky, who had attended secondary school with Nina in Geneva.
 
Anna Kamensky was born on August 25, 1867, near St. Petersburg. Until the age of fifteen, she enjoyed a very happy childhood, first in Germany and then in Geneva, where she finished her secondary education. Her dream was to attend a university, but at that time her mother's financial situation had become desperate, so they were forced to return to their homeland. After Anna and Nina had finished school, both families, the Kamenskys and Gernets, returned to Russia.
 
Anna was deeply involved in the Enlightenment movement, begun in Russia on the initiative of progressive groups with the intention of liberally informing the Russian people. The initial stimulus for the rise of Theosophy in Russia was an unexpected event in Anna's life. As mentioned above, Nina Gernet had left a collection of Theosophical literature at Anna Kamensky's residence and repeatedly urged her to become acquainted with these works, insisting, "This is just right for you."
 
But Anna had to spend all day giving lessons in French in order to support her family: a mother, an aunt, and two younger sisters. She devoted all her free time between lessons to her social enlightenment activities. Owing to this unending task, she was not able to follow her friend's wishes until an unfortunate event resulted in involuntary leisure.
 
In 1899, while hurrying to a lesson, Anna Kamensky slipped on the street, fell, and broke a leg. This accident forced her to stay in bed for an entire month. She remembered the collection of Theosophical literature and asked for whichever book was at the top of the trunk holding Nina Gernet's Theosophical volumes. That book turned out to be Annie Besant's In the Outer Court. From the first page, Anna was so captivated that she read the whole book straight through during the night. When she had finished, it seemed to her that "before her a veil had been torn and she beheld the entire path of humanity and the entire meaning of suffering."
 
After reading Annie Besant's book In the Outer Court, Anna immediately became a member of the English Section of the Theosophical Society, and in 1902 set off for London, where she met Annie Besant, who had come there to preside at the convention. Shortly afterwards, Anna wrote Besant a letter in which she described her soul's current state of development and her wish to pursue enlightenment through Theosophical work. In reply to this letter, Annie Besant invited her for a visit and after a prolonged conversation declared that she would accept Anna as her personal pupil.

 

Tolstoy and Theosophy 

Leo Tolstoy, although not directly connected with the history of the Theosophical Society in Russia, had a sympathetic attitude toward Theosophy. He took a course in Theosophy and read our Theosophical Herald, thanks to being constantly in touch with his daughter-in-law Sofia Tolstoy, who was one of the first to join the Russian Theosophical Society and was an active member. She made it her usual practice to go to Yasnaya Polyana, where Tolstoy lived, with the final proofs of articles for the Theosophical Herald, which he read carefully. On one of them were such notations in his hand as "true," "good," and "very good." From these notations it was clear that he accepted the entire ethical side of Theosophical teaching and shared it.
 
In the summer of 1908 Anna Kamensky and I visited Tolstoy. During the whole afternoon we were there, Tolstoy spent it in conversation with us, paying careful attention to everything that concerned Theosophy. I gave him an account of my first encounter with Theosophy in the park of the Rikli sanatorium, where all the patients spent the time from morning to dinner in direct oneness with nature, barefoot, in just their smocks. I noticed six individuals who were all behaving with such good will and attentiveness to others that I decided they all surely belonged to the same spiritual society. When I made their acquaintance, I learned to my great surprise that they were all from different countries and had first met here at the Rikli sanatorium. Noticing my astonishment, one of them, an English woman replied smiling: "This similarity is natural, we are all members of the Theosophical Society." This imprint of nobility on the human soul was what drew me toward Theosophy.
 
After listening to my story, Tolstoy repeated several times with great animation, "That's how I understand it! That's how it really is! Not just words, it's a person that causes change, that's the main thing!"
 
Afterwards, Sofia Tolstoy told me that, when we had left and over the next several days, her father-in-law kept repeating my story to new visitors, and each time he would conclude, "That's how it really is! That's the main thing!"
 
We all loved him. He awakened our conscience. He recognized karma and reincarnation, but he would declare, "None of that is important, only one thing matters: love one another, and all the rest will follow."

 

Search and Seizure 

In 1920, when the activities of all societies were curtailed, including those of the Theosophical Society, one night the government conducted a search of the Theosophical Center. The investigator had an order for the arrest of Anna Kamensky, but at the time she happened to be out of the city, at the Lesny sanatorium, where her mother had just been buried and she herself lay ill. During the search, the editorial secretary, Tsetselia Gelmboldt, demonstrated remarkable self-control and presence of mind, thanks to which she managed to save Annie Besant's letters to Anna. The portraits of the Masters also, by some miracle, remained and were not seized. The search did not uncover anything dangerous; nevertheless the agents of the Secret Police took away many papers, manuscripts, and letters that were stored there.
 
On the next day after the search of the headquarters of the Theosophical Society, a soldier appeared with a warrant to arrest Anna Kamensky and take her to the Secret Police. Tsetselia began to explain to the soldier that Anna was out of the city, lying ill, and could not appear. The soldier turned out to be goodhearted and advised her to go herself and personally explain the reason for the absence of the chairwoman.
 
Tsetselia went immediately to the Secret Police but had not even finished her explanations when the official started to shout at her and threaten that, if they were to go into hiding, he would send both of them to exile in Tmutarakan! To this, Tsetselia replied that they would not think of going into hiding, that Anna was just lying sick at Lesny. "I'll give you my word that in a week, when she is better, she herself will come to you." In answer to this, the policeman began to shout that such promises would not work on him, that Anna Kamensky had to appear at once, otherwise "both of you are going to Tmutarakan!" To this Tsetselia calmly answered, "Well, so what! Even in Tmutarakan it may be all right if a person does not do wrong. A person carries light inside and shines it everywhere."
 
The policeman screwed up his eyes at her, and she continued, "We are not thinking of going into hiding. You can rely on our promise. If you were acquainted with our teachings, you would know that we cannot lie. And why are you shouting so? It's hard for me to listen, and you are wasting your energy; in order to understand one another, it's much better to speak in a normal voice, without straining." After these words the policeman started combing the back of his head and said in an entirely different tone of voice, "It's true, this is just a habit we have. You can go, just so Anna Kamensky shows up here in a week!" When Tsetselia was walking away, he got up and stopped her: "Wait! I'll give you a pass!" Later she found out that without this piece of paper they would not have let her out.
 
After a week passed, Anna had just managed to return from the sanatorium when she was sent a notice to appear at the Secret Police in person. She at once set off, and her devoted friend Tsetselia decided to go with her as well. This was very risky, since those who entered the doors of the Secret Police for the most part never came out again.
 
They were led into the office of the investigator, and then separated. Tsetselia was taken into an adjacent room, and each of them was given a printed questionnaire to which detailed answers were required. One of the questions was "How do you regard the commune?" They were both interrogated; although they were in different rooms, they both answered in the same way, word for word, saying that for Theosophists a spiritual community was one of the ideals of the future.
 
The investigator tried to trap them and to upset them with shouts and crude insults. He called them "enemies of the people," accusing them of underground intrigues, and threatened them with prison and exile if they did not sincerely confess all their crimes. In passing he questioned them about friends and colleagues, trying to obtain their names and addresses. When they did not answer these questions, the investigator grew more abusive.
 
He began to accuse them of sabotage and parasitism, to which they responded that they wanted to work but they were persecuted everywhere and prevented in every way possible from laboring for the benefit of the people. On hearing this, the investigator stunned them. He proposed that Anna become head of a New Spiritual Academy, where she would be free to propagate Theosophy, but only on one condition: she must convince people that there was no God and that every religion was a false doctrine.
 
Tsetsilia, in her turn, was offered the post of nothing more or less than the Commissar of Public Enlightenment. When she declined, the investigator gave her a penetrating look and asked why she had refused. "Because," she replied, "I do not consider myself qualified for such an important and responsible job. I do not have enough knowledge for it." "Nonsense!" shouted the investigator. "We pull a peasant away from his plow and put him in a responsible post, and he does not refuse!" "Because he does not realize," declared Tsetselia, "that he does not have the knowledge and does not have a sense of responsibility, but I have enough of both to understand how much one needs to know in order to be a good Commissar of Public Enlightenment."
 
Anna also refused the honor offered, and they continued to interrogate her for five more hours. Finally Anna changed her tone and sharply and energetically expressed her exasperation that innocent citizens had to undergo such an inquisition. After that the investigator changed his tone, stopped shouting, and let them go.

 

Escape from Soviet Russia 

Anna and Tsetselia managed to flee at the beginning of June 1921 through the forests and swamps of Finland.
 
At that time in St. Petersburg, several secret organizations conducted refugees across the border. Anna and Tsetselia were able to make contact with one of them. The plan of escape was as follows. One of the Finnish milkmaids who brought milk into St. Petersburg from a village by the border volunteered to ride with Anna and Tsetsilia as far as the next railway station and then lead them through the forest to her house in the village. There they would rest, and at dawn two Finnish smugglers were supposed to come for them and lead them over a nearby river that separated Russia and Finland.
 
On the day set for departure, Anna and Tsetsilia dressed in proletarian clothes and covered their heads with kerchiefs like those worn by peasant women. Shouldering knapsacks that contained all necessary toilet articles, one change of underwear, the Gospels, and the Bhagavad Gita, they set off on their perilous journey.
 
All went well as the fugitives traveled by rail and then walked through the forest, following the milkmaid and pretending that she was walking by herself and that they did not know her. But just when they were getting close to her village, the milkmaid suddenly noticed on a tree some kind of sign indicating that a Red Army patrol was in the vicinity.
 
She left the fugitives in the forest and ran ahead by herself into the village. This happened just as it was starting to get dark, and soon night had completely fallen. Anna and Tsetsilia started to feel creepy, waiting there in a strange forest. When the milkmaid returned, they learned from her that Red Army troops had indeed entered the village, and to go there would be dangerous. They would need to take a new route through forests and swamps and avoid the road for ten miles northward. The milkmaid led them down a ravine, where the smugglers, two healthy young Finns, were waiting for them; then she went off alone to the village.
 
All night until dawn, the refugees walked through the woods and swamps but not once did they experience fear or doubt. The warm June night, the starry sky, spreading out over them, and the forest thickets all seemed like an enchanted kingdom. They felt that an angel was guiding them and that, without a doubt, everything would turn out well. Both of them experienced a profound sense of peace.
 
And indeed everything did go well right to the end, and their peaceful mood was broken on only two occasions. Just before they left the forest, the smugglers took out revolvers and demanded immediate payment, excusing their demand by pointing out the possibility of meeting up with the patrol that was threatening them all with death. They wanted to be paid, no matter what. But Anna, considering the situation, calmly and firmly reminded them that by their mutual agreement payment was to be made after crossing the border, and not before; then the guides relented.
 
They experienced a second alarming moment when they began to go down toward the river. No one could be seen, there was complete silence, but dawn had already started to break. Going down to the very edge of the river and considering themselves safe, the smugglers began to take off their shoes to ford the river barefoot. At that moment, Tsetselia grew frightened, thinking it would take too long to get her shoes off, and she worried that Red Army troops might suddenly appear at the last second, So she plunged into the river, not waiting for the smugglers to take off their shoes or show her where the ford was. Anna followed after her, and both came up onto the far shore completely soaked, while the guides crossed the dry way.
 
When they stepped up onto Finnish soil, Anna crossed herself and said, "Thank God! We are on free land!" And Tsetselia stretched out her arms toward the shore they had left and in tears declared, "All our brothers and sisters are still left there."

 


George M. Young, Ph.D., is a Slavicist who has taught Russian and Comparative Literature at Grinnell and Dartmouth Colleges, although for many years he ran a fine arts and auction business. He is the author of many articles and books on Russian literature and religious philosophy. Young currently teaches English literature at the University of New England. These excerpts are from his translation of Elena Pisareva's journal, The Light of the Russian Soul: A Personal Memoir of Early Russian Theosophy (Quest Books, 2008).


Zen Tea and Catholic Eucharist

 

By Gene C. Sager

Theosophical Society - Gene Sager teaches at Palomar College and is coauthor of Patterns of Religion (2005). He has translated articles by Kyoto University’s Keiji Nishitani, in addition to authoring numerous articles on environmental issues and Asian religion published in Commonweal and The Middle Way. He frequents Hindu ashrams, Zen monasteries, and Catholic retreats in search of spiritual solutions to modern problemsI WAS A COCKY CATHOLIC KID WHEN I ARRIVED in Japan. Having completed my degree in religious studies and philosophy at an American university, I thought I could grasp anything the Japanese might throw at me. I could see the infinite Buddha-nature and hear the sound of one hand clapping.

After four years of book learning and hands-on practice in Japan, I knew less than when I arrived. My Zen master hammered some of my arrogance away. Tea ceremony lessons were the most difficult for me; my tea whisking was a disaster. Through it all I have arrived at a juncture where I believe I can give a fair accounting of two paradigmatical ceremonies: the Zen tea ceremony, which was relatively new to me, and the Catholic Eucharist, a part of my Western background.

At first I was struck by the differences between the two rituals, but then recognized remarkable similarities. Both ceremonies effect union with the ultimate. Through comparisons of the Zen tea and Catholic Eucharist ceremonies, I rediscovered the truth of the old adage, “He who knows only London, knows not London.” My Zen training shed light on my Catholic practice and vice versa.
Legend has it that the Zen Patriarch Bodhidharma brought the teachings of Zen Buddhism from India to China. A Japanese version of the origin of the tea bush says that Bodhidharma once fell asleep while meditating and was so furious when he awoke that he cut off his eyelids. Falling to the ground, the eyelids sprang forth as the first tea plants. Tea has thereafter played a special role in Zen tradition.

Two Early Japanese tea masters were Myo-an Eisai (1141–1215), who brought seedlings from China and introduced green tea into Japan; and Sen-no-Rikyu (1522–1591), founder of the ceremony called cha-no-yu (literally tea of hot water). The ceremonial tea is not made from leaves steeped in water; it is hot water and finely powdered green tea frothed with a bamboo whisk. The master or host serves the tea and small cakes in bowls and plates carefully chosen for their beauty. The number of recipients or guests is usually small—five or less. Few words, if any, are spoken.

So artful are the utensils and the host’s movements that cha-no-yu has become a popular art form and is sometimes performed without attention to Zen teachings. There are two types of tea ceremonies—one performed as a conscious part of Zen practice, and the other a purely aesthetic or cultural event. A “cultured lady” in Japan is trained in cha-no-yu and ikebana (flower arranging).
The Catholic Eucharist originated with the Last Supper when Jesus broke bread and shared a cup of wine with his disciples.

He took the bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, “Take and eat; this is my body.” Then He took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, “Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matthew 26:26–28).

His followers continued to meet for communal meals after Jesus left this world; they experienced His presence in the bread and wine. Many of the earliest Christians were Jewish and so partaking of the bread and wine on the Sabbath was a natural practice for them. For these Jewish Christians the ritual now took on the most power-ful meaning: it united them with the divine Messiah.

Originally, these communal meals were rather informal gatherings in the home of one of the followers of Jesus—no priesthood and no formal structure existed. As the movement developed, a priesthood was instituted and only priests were allowed to consecrate and distribute the bread and wine. Church buildings were needed to accommodate the followers. The full communal meal was phased out and the taking of bread and wine (Eucharist) became the central ritual in a service which includes prayers, songs, scripture reading, and a homily. The priest offers a prayer of thanksgiving just as Jesus did before sharing the bread and wine; the term Eucharist is derived from the Greek word for thanksgiving. The gratitude we experience at the Eucharist comprehends the full significance of Jesus’ life—the Incarnation, the teachings and miracles, His sacrificial death for the forgiveness of sins, and His Resurrection.

The liturgy of the Eucharist abounds in words with virtually no periods of silence. The Zen tea ceremony cherishes silence. A haiku portrays the atmosphere of cha-no-yu:

No one spoke
Neither the host
Nor the guest
Nor the white chrysanthemum

From the slow, graceful movements of the host, to the simple beauty of the bowls, to the single flower in the tokonoma (alcove), all is tranquility and silence. One can settle into the now, letting go of the past and future. This silence allows the individual to quiet the mind and hear, as we say in the West, “the still small voice within.” Such an atmosphere can foster a deep awareness of self and the sacred (be it called Buddha-nature or God).

Once I had tasted the spiritual benefits of cha-no-yu, I realized that my religious experience had been too limited. The Eucharist provides one type of experience, but it is not contemplative; it does not penetrate to the depths. Contemplatives in all religions have benefited from contemplation, and Catholicism has a rich tradition of “contemplative prayer”—quieting of the mind, freeing the mind from all thoughts and words. It is simply being present to God. I had failed to partake in the full range of spiritual practices my Catholic faith can provide. Exposure to other religions has helped me discover the richness and variety of Catholic tradition.

The Zen tea has exquisite ways of allowing individuals to rediscover their spiritual center, but it does not foster a communal spirit. The Eucharist instills a sense of community among the participants. “We become one with Christ and with one another in communion” (Faith Alive, Twenty-Third Publications, 2000). We sing, pray aloud together, and share a sign of peace expressed by a handshake or hug. In contrast, the experience of cha-no-yu feels more like individuals in contemplation. The Zen tea is contemplative; the Eucharist is communal.

I have always loved the mass (the service built around the Eucharist) for its beauty and power. I continued to go to mass after my stay in Japan, but one experience raised some important questions for me. A friend of mine expressed an interest in the mass and asked if he could join me for Sunday mass. Just before the service started my friend asked, “Can I go up to receive communion? I’m Protestant, is that okay?” I replied, “Sure, of course,” but with confusion on my face. I fumbled through the song books in the pew in front of us and found the ever-present Catholic missal. On the first page we found “Guidelines for the Reception of Communion” which say Protestants are not admitted to Holy Communion (United States Catholic Conference, 1996). My friend could not receive the bread and wine. I tried to hide my pain and wondered if this was an exclusive club. Would Jesus deny my friend?

The Eucharist has a sense of exclusiveness about it: only a priest can perform it, and Protestants and all non-Christians are excluded. By contrast, cha-no-yu involves no such exclusions; anyone can perform it and anyone can participate. Is there not some irony at the heart of the Eucharistic rite? It provides a way of uniting people yet some are excluded. So I feel we must ponder the communal spirit of the Eucharist. I hope this spirit is not in any way achieved by excluding others. A unity protected by a wall would not be as rich as an open one.

The Zen tea and Catholic Eucharist ceremonies are based on markedly different theologies or philosophies. In Zen, the ultimate sacred being is not God, but Reality as a whole called Buddha-nature, Big Self, or true self. Each thing or being, even a microbe or a mote of dust, is inseparably interwoven with everything else, and each thing or being bears the essential nature of the whole. In Catholic theology, the ultimate sacred being is the triune God, and God is clearly distinguish-ed from creation. Philosophers call Zen nondualistic (the ultimate and the universe are one) while Catholicism is considered dualistic (the ultimate and creation are distinct).

Asian philosophers offer contrasting concepts to help us see two different ways of relating to the ultimate: jiriki, which means self-power, and tariki, which means other-power. Zen is a self-power path and Christianity is an other-power path. In Zen tea we realize the power of our true self and in the Eucharist we receive a power other than ourselves—the saving power of Christ.

In some ways Zen tea and Catholic Eucharist seem worlds apart, but there are important similarities. Both are powerful rituals because they involve partaking of specialized elements. The ceremonial tea is not the green tea that the Japanese drink on a daily basis. It is powdered light green tea which is prepared with a whisk. The Eucharistic bread is unleavened, recalling that the Last Supper occurred at Passover when Jews ate only unleavened bread. The priest pours a small amount of water into the wine, recalling the scripture which says a soldier pierced Jesus’ side with a spear “bringing forth a sudden flow of blood and water” (John 19:34). So when we partake of Zen tea or the special bread and wine at the Eucharist, we know we are participating in an extraordinary event.

The two rituals are essentially the same in this way: both are experiences of union with the ultimate sacred being, and partaking of the elements renews one’s relation to the ultimate. Both the Zen tea experience and the Eucharist experience are pure and direct because the elements are not mere symbols of the ultimate. In Zen it is said, “This very tea, Buddha-nature.” For Catholics, the bread is the very body of Christ, not a mere symbol of the body.

I have come to value both ceremonies because they can help us find the peace so desperately needed today. The Zen saying surely fits my experience: “Drinking a bowl of green tea, I stopped the war.” The “war” here is internal turmoil which agitates and clouds our mind and lessens our effectiveness in this world. The Eucharist brings us the peace that Jesus offered to his disciples and to all: “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you.”

Both rites give us a measure of inner peace and some respite from a world which seems to have gone mad with hyperactivity, consumerism, and violence. But I am not advocating any sort of escapism here. Neither Zen tea nor the Catholic Eucharist is intended to mitigate our efforts in improving this world and working for external peace. On the contrary, the tea ceremony and the Eucharist prepare us for and inspire us to works of love. The culmination of Zen is:

To enter the market place
With bliss-bestowing hands
(Tenth ox drawing of Kakuan).

The culmination of Catholicism and Christianity in general is:

To love the Lord your God with all your heart,
And with all your soul, and with all your mind, and
To love your neighbor as yourself
(Matthew 22:37–39).


Gene Sager teaches at Palomar College and is coauthor of Patterns of Religion (2005). He has translated articles by Kyoto University’s Keiji Nishitani, in addition to authoring numerous articles on environmental issues and Asian religion published in Commonweal and The Middle Way. He frequents Hindu ashrams, Zen monasteries, and Catholic retreats in search of spiritual solutions to modern problems.


Explorations: Healing the Rift: Working with the Power of the Land

By Coleston Brown

Originally printed in the Spring 2009 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Brown, Coleston. "Explorations: Healing the Rift: Working with the Power of the Land." Quest  97. 2 (Spring 2009): 70-71.

Theosophical Society - Coleston Brown is the author of Magical Christianity: The Power of Symbols for Spiritual Renewal  (Quest Books, 2007). He is committed to practicing and teaching the Magical Way, which he defines as a transreligious spiritual path of personal and planetary transformation. He has a Web site at www.magicalways.com .Although their expressive forms are continually filtered through cultural patterns, at heart native spiritual traditions retain a unity that transcends local idiosyncrasies. Generally speaking, these traditions are rooted in a set of power centers in the land—an inner-land matrix, a unified field of forces that underlie and underpin physical reality. It is these forces that modern magical work with the land aims at contacting.

One major problem encountered by those who attempt to work with the power in the land of North America is what I call "the Rift." This shadowy layer of energy that shrouds entry to the inner-land matrix is largely the result of the sudden occlusion of the native mystery current. It is a side-effect of the forcible suppression of American Indian cultures and traditions. The Rift lies like a wound upon the land and is as real an obstruction for those who are of Native American descent as it is for those who are not—though each type reacts in a different manner.

Perhaps the most common symptom among non-Native Americans who contact the Rift is a powerful feeling of guilt, a great shame over events, actual or assumed, perpetrated by an invading culture upon the aboriginal inhabitants of this land. Often these non-Indians feel that somehow they do not really belong here, that their roots are elsewhere. Sometimes they even feel remorse for the fact that they cannot "become native." In extreme cases, some people will have a fear of being overwhelmed by powerful archaic forces, leading to a strong aversion to the whole area of sacred magic and the native traditions. Or they may attempt to imitate an earlier stage of consciousness by identifying with the immature and falsely idealized notion of the "noble savage."

Such reactions are simply part and parcel of coming to terms with a collective karmic debt. A tremendous amount of psychic stress has led to the formation of the Rift over the past 500 years or so. It should therefore be no great surprise that this tension constitutes a hefty stumbling block to further spiritual development or that it initially tends to release in powerful and unbalanced ways when one attempts entry into the deeper psychic levels of the land.

Fortunately, a number of magical groups and individuals have worked to alleviate these difficulties, particularly in the past thirty or forty years (though complete release is an ongoing and long-term process). Much of this work has involved working with sacred Dreamers, who are presences in the landscape. They are often mentioned in local traditions in connection with features such as hills, mountains, rivers, lakes, stones, and trees. Another mode of work, particularly with groups, has been to forge inner links with the inner powers and spiritual presences of native traditions in other parts of the world. Such efforts have resulted in the creation of buffers that grant access to the inner-land power with minimal negative reaction, even for relatively inexperienced hands.

Initially, this access is best gained by moving through the sacred magical and mythological patterns of our territorial ancestors. Magicians make extensive use of forms and patterns from the past, yet this should never be done in a reactionary mood; we should primarily be looking forward, not back. After all, the purpose of making this kind of contact is to regenerate and rechannel the power within the landscape into forms appropriate for the future development of a unified spiritual identity.

Forms of contact with the powers of the land range across a surprisingly broad spectrum of experience, of which there are three main bands, which we can simply categorize as individual, national, and international.

Individual contact with the land results in an awareness of being closer to nature, of being earthed and balanced. Many magical workers form elemental contacts as a means of maintaining psychic equilibrium.

Properly trained and dedicated magical workers are channels for the spiritual power in the land on which they live. And they will inevitably be called upon to mediate this power in order to help in the healing of the national soul. The inner-land power centers situated within the territorial boundaries of a nation have a potent influence on that nation's identity, helping to form its unique character. Old World mystery groups used to focus a tremendous amount of their energies on the healing and development of the soul of the nation in which they lived. Unfortunately, this kind of national healing is sadly lacking in the annals of magical work in North America. And yet, experience shows that an inadequate or an exclusive focus on the national level tends to breed a parochial, nationalistic egotism.

Fortunately, this can be counterbalanced by excursions into planetary or international magic. International magic is aimed at the healing and development of the planetary soul—that of the earth as a whole. The potential scope for international magic has been greatly expanded by the advances in world communications of our current era. It is, however, an area of work presently fraught with difficulty. Again, much of the problem stems from karmic stumbling blocks rooted in the history of international affairs. There is a further difficulty in that inner planetary work requires people to be willing and able to sacrifice a portion of their participation in the national psyche of their home country while simultaneously maintaining a strong link to the currents of power in the land. To say the least, this kind of balancing act requires a rare combination of experience and spiritual fortitude.

Be this as it may, such work does go on, and important international linkups are being made through which the inner-land powers of different countries are cross-fed and even merged into one another.

Whatever our Old World roots may be, the ancient American Indians are our territorial ancestors. As such, their traditional material can supply us with the means to forge important spiritual contacts with the land. Now I am not suggesting that you go out and take courses in Native American shamanism, perform pipe ceremonies, attend sweat lodges, or imitate other culturally specific practices. In fact, such things raise a host of issues, ethical and otherwise, that are too complicated to address here. Rather what I'm suggesting is a simple tuning of consciousness to certain places and patterns of sacred lore. One useful example of the kind of lore I mean is the legend of "The Stone That Gives All Story," a Seneca tradition that tells of "Orphan," who sets off into a forest on a journey of initiation. In the course of his journey, Orphan comes upon a glade where there is a tall stone. He sits on it to rest. This is no ordinary stone, however. It speaks, and Orphan soon finds himself listening to wondrous stories. (For a fuller account, see E. Ella Clark, Indian Legends of Canada, [Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1977]). Although expressed in a specific, localized tradition, the tale contains images and motifs that are transcultural and which can thus be used as entry points to the inner-land matrix in many places.

To connect with the presence and stream of power behind the stone, you can use techniques such as recitation (ritually telling the story) and empowered vision (building the main images of the story in your imagination). I give a version of this tale in the form of a visionary practice, with operational notes, on my Web site.

You can also set up your own stone in your home or yard, or you can find one in a local park. It need not be large or obtrusive, just a focus to link you in when you do the visionary work mentioned above. These small efforts can establish a meaningful and lively relationship with the land you live on and will give you access to energies that will benefit you, your family, friends, and local community. Beyond this, if you are called to them, are acts of spiritual service to the earth and all its creatures.


Coleston Brown is the author of Magical Christianity: The Power of Symbols for Spiritual Renewal  (Quest Books, 2007). He is committed to practicing and teaching the Magical Way, which he defines as a transreligious spiritual path of personal and planetary transformation. He has a Web site at www.magicalways.com .


Sustaining Nature

By Andre Clewell

Originally printed in the Spring 2009 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Clewell, Andre. "Sustaining Nature." Quest  97. 2 (Spring 2009): 60- 63.

Theosophical Society - Andre Clewell is a Theosophist from Ellenton, Florida. His latest book, Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession, was published in 2007 by Island Press.When Nelson Mandela assumed leadership of South Africa's post-apartheid government in 1994, he was faced with two seemingly intractable problems. One was pervasive poverty among the nation's black population. The other was the rapid spread of trees from Australia—eucalyptus among them—that were planted in plantations a century earlier to augment scarce supplies of lumber. These alien trees were now reseeding everywhere and replacing native ecosystems.  Their deep roots removed soil moisture. Water tables were lowered, and farmers could scarcely grow crops as entire landscapes dried out.


Mandela's government seized an opportunity to resolve both issues simultaneously. The nation's poor were hired in a massive public works program called Working for Water. A civilian army spread out across the countryside, cutting down every invasive tree in sight. More than a million acres have been cleared. In 2005 alone, 32,000 people participated. Enough water has been saved to fill a reservoir on a medium-sized river each year.

Positive environmental stories like Working for Water are sparingly reported by our news media, which thrives on disaster stories like global warming and sea level rise. But there are other big success stories waiting to be reported.

One is occurring not far to the west of the Theosophical Society Headquarters at Adyar, India, where depleted forests have been overtaken by brush. People in many tribal villages of this region became impoverished, because their former forests could no longer sustain them economically with wood, thatching material, foods, and medicinal plants. These forests once served as natural "sponges" that absorbed rainfall that was later tapped by people for their potable water supply. Now rainfall runs off the brushland and is lost as flow during flash floods, leaving little to drink in the prolonged annual dry season. Personnel from the Forest Department of the State of Tamil Nadu stepped in with a program for people to restore their former forests, their water supply, and thus their economies.

The foresters presented workshops in every town, where citizens learned about forest degradation, the importance of healthy forests to their well-being, and how they could restore forests as community projects. People gathered seeds of native trees and grew them in village nurseries that the Forest Department established. Then teams of citizens spread across the countryside to plant these young tree sprouts. They constructed small reservoirs to retain water until the forest recovered.

The Forest Department encouraged the formation of women's groups and made small loans to them to establish local businesses. Some women's groups are collecting palm fronds from the forest from which they make handicrafts for export. This local, forest-based industry has generated much-needed income for their villages.

There is another success story from the center of one of the world's hotspots.  As rivers go, the Alexander River does not match up to the grandeur of the Nile. In fact, it would not take an Olympian to broad-jump across it in places. It begins in Palestinian hills near Nablus in the West Bank and flows eastward into Israel and the Mediterranean Sea at Tel Aviv. In 1995, it was a dirty, polluted mess, from raw sewage and residues from olive presses and stone-cutting plants.

Palestinian and Israeli citizens got together to do something about it, including some environmental professionals who volunteered their expertise. It began as a low-key affair, with civic leaders from towns all along the river meeting quietly to make plans in a back room of the German embassy, away from the hysteria of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Then citizens from these towns volunteered their free time in a massive cleanup effort. In a spontaneous display of international unity, they made the water sparkle and turned the river's weedy flood plain into attractive public parks. The rare and spectacularly large Nile soft-shelled turtle returned to the river to the delight of everyone and as an apparent symbol of their success.

These three environmental vignettes from South Africa, India, and the Middle East share a common thread. They are bottom-up, community-based endeavors conducted by the people themselves. They were assisted by the government as they took charge of their own natural environments. In this manner local people participated in the natural processes of their own ecosystems and essentially became inseparable from nature. Such participation develops an appreciation and respect for nature. In turn, nature sustains people with clean water and other natural bounties. This union with nature can lead to nation-building, as it did in South Africa, and towards world peace, as in the miracle that happened along the Alexander River.

Ordinarily, we don't consider nature and economics in the same breath. Instead, we think of economic development and the environmental destruction it brings in its wake as the very antithesis of nature. But these three vignettes are telling us something else—that nature and economics are tightly intertwined. The byword is "sustainable development" whereby we take care of nature and nature takes care of us, indefinitely into the future. We need to treat nature as if people mattered, and treat economics as if nature mattered.

"Very good!" you may say, "But what do those vignettes from halfway around the world have to do with me here in the American heartland?"  The answer is, "Plenty!" In recent years, it seems like each spring brings headlines about floods along the Mississippi River and its far-reaching tributaries. A principal reason for these floods has been well known ever since the floods of 1993 that crept into suburbs of St. Louis and onto our television screens as we watched for weeks as people clung to rooftops of flooded homes. So what was the problem?

Thousands of farmers throughout the upper Midwest had converted small headwater marshes into croplands. Previously, the marshes served to retain snowmelt and spring rainfall, releasing it in increments throughout the rest of the year in to streams that eventually joined the Mississippi. Before those conversions to cropland began, the Mississippi River swelled each spring onto its natural flood plain, but not to the point that it threatened St. Louis and gave television crews sensational footage.

What was the remedy? We built more levees and attempted other expensive engineering solutions, but the floods keep returning. The permanent solution would be to restore those thousands of small marshes throughout the upper Midwest. Land that was taken out of production in a government subsidy program can be substituted without decreases in food production and farm income. But do we know how to restore these marshes? You bet we do! The cost would be high but no greater than the property losses that were suffered in the 1993 flood.

So where's the proof that we can restore Midwestern marshes? Next time you are at the TS's national headquarters, look out the back door of the Olcott Building. Just to the right of the labyrinth you will see a patch of restored prairie that staff member Jeff Gresko installed several years ago. Its perky display of bright yellow compass-plants, which rise above the tall Indian grasses, adds a vibrant splash of color to the grounds. In terms of plant species, this is a drier version of the same kind of prairie that was removed from those thousands of acres of marshlands in the upper Midwest. If Jeff Gresko can exercise his tall, lithe, compass-plant-like frame to restore prairie at Olcott, then it can be done elsewhere. It's not hard to do. It just takes gumption.

Precedents for native prairie restoration exist all over the greater Chicago region. A restored prairie occupies much of the campus of the College of DuPage near Olcott. Two dozen large prairies grace public parks that encircle suburban Chicago. All were restored by thousands of local volunteers who began their work about thirty-five years ago. Another restored prairie sits on top of the underground accelerator at the Fermi Lab—site of last year's excursion during Summer National Gathering.

Nature sustains us, as long as we sustain nature. From a Theosophical point of view, that's another expression of the principle of oneness. When we restore nature, in a real sense we become one with nature, and we also become one with those who have joined in common effort at a restoration project site. In this way (and with apologies to Annie Besant), I suggest that all who feel themselves as one with nature restored, know they are therefore one with every other.


Andre Clewell is a Theosophist from Ellenton, Florida. His latest book, Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession, was published in 2007 by Island Press. Contact him at clewell@verizon.net.

 

Subcategories