Kundalini and the Chill

Printed in the Spring 2013 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Nesky, Andrew.
 "Kundalini and the Chill" Quest  101. 2 (Spring 2013): pg. 64 - 67 

By Andrew Nesky III

Theosophical Society - Andrew Nesky III is the president of the Theosophical Society in Pittsburgh. He has twice been elected to the position of Master of a Masonic Lodge and is a published writer. As an actor he has appeared in hundreds of performances on regional stages; he also lectures on metaphysics and human development and has coached high-school competitive public speaking. Andrew hosted the Webcasted talk show "Science and the Outer Streams," which investigates the frontiers of human thought, science, and spiritualityThe Sanskrit word "kundalini" is literally trans­lated as "coiled." The word is found principally in the lexicon of yogic and Tantric practice and refers to a latent energy or consciousness that resides at a point approximately at the base of the spine. It is usually pictured as either a "coiled serpent" or a "god­dess." In either context it is considered feminine and is related to unconscious, instinctive, and/or libidinal forces. 

Some yogic and Tantric traditions claim that this force can be "awakened" by various means, a moment at which it will "uncoil" and begin its ascension to its "lover" (or polar counterpart), which resides at an area approximately at the top of the head. When the ascen­sion is completed, the union of these sympathetic forces is thought by some to produce an illuminated human being. 

Actual, documentable accounts of kundalini ascen­sion are very difficult to come by, a fact that has created a field ripe for speculative and distorted descriptions of the process. In response, this article speaks directly to the realities of this ancient and important human pos­sibility through a first-person account, incorporating events that were witnessed by others who can verify that many of the external phenomena actually took place. 

The event happened when I was in my mid-thirties. It was the second of two life-changing transits that seemed to come from nowhere. This nowhere was within the most personal of all experiences—the act of having sex. While in retrospect it seems a natural culmi­nation of spiritual and psychic processes that had begun during my twenties, this kundalini experience was as uncultivated and unexpected as any other miracle.

While I have been asked to avoid graphic sexual descriptions of the triggering event, I want to say that I believe that specifics of posture, position, and action are key to the process. It is further important to say that the sexual energy was extreme and unquenchable. As the event moved to its conclusion, I felt something that I took for the onset of an orgasm. It was deeper than I'd ever felt before, and began at a place I would later identify as the bottom of my tailbone. It started a pleasing warm glow that began in a very small but then progressively expanded. The sensation very pleasant and unlike anything I'd ever experienced. I was preparing myself for what I was sure was my climax when suddenly I felt the "ball of energy" liquefy and begin to move up my spine.

The liquid energy seemed to be traversing a channel that followed the path of my spine and whose rear radius extended beyond the limits of my physical body. As it started to move, my erection collapsed without discharge.

The energy continued its upward movement until suddenly it seemed to encounter a block at the approximate level of my heart. I felt the pressure build until the barrier broke, which freed it to continue its upward path. 

I was sure I was having some sort of stroke and was concerned that if the process reached my brain would die. At about this moment, the upward-moving force encountered another barrier at the level of neck. This barrier was much denser, causing the energy to exert more and more pressure. I called out to confused partner to rub my neck. During the neck rub, I felt the energy push past the blockage and begin streaming into something that felt like a chamber at the top of my head. It was as if an area between the top my brain and the underside of my skull were lined with a bladder that was being filled. As the energy entered the receptacle, I felt the cavity expand to accommodate it. I genuinely thought I might die. 

The energy continued to flow until it seemed to completely occupy the space—and then stopped. At first the resulting pressure was very uncomfortable. While experienced this discomfort in my head, my body felt as if it had been pinned to the bed. Like a boxer who finds himself on his back after a particularly hard punch, I couldn't move my arms or legs. After some time passed, I was able to roll off the bed and crawl to the bathroom, where the hot tub of water I'd asked my partner to pre­pare waited for me. I soaked until the water started to become cold and then found that I could stand and walk. As hours passed, the pressure at my crown con­tinued, but with some over-the-counter painkillers the sensation was bearable. After a few days passed, I no longer required the medication. After a few weeks, I realized the energy would be staying in what seemed to be its new home.

During this initial period, I suspected that I had had a stroke. I spoke to my doctor and he prescribed a CT scan, but there were no anomalies. Finally he told me he had no diagnosis and had never heard of anything that could explain the symptoms I told him about. 

Beside the addition of the new energetic form in my crown, I found that my body had experienced several other changes. My "chill reflex" —the tingle that starts at the base of the spine and works its way to the top of the head—would never be the same; it was as if the most important part was no longer in it. I would also never again feel the tingle that indicated the chill had made it to the top of my head; that space now belonged to the energy that was residing there. My orgasm also changed: it was less intense, and the tingle that used to occur at the top of my crown was no more.

As of this writing, the energy has spent over a decade in its new habitation. It becomes active (with a sort of glow that is felt rather than seen) when I meditate or otherwise focus my attention on it. The rest of the time it is known only by the ever-present background pres­sure that is a constant reminder of its initial ascension. 

When it became apparent that there was no medical explanation for my condition, I began to look to esoteric literature. I thought it possible that I had experienced a kundalini ascension, but I had little information about such things. Until that time I was convinced that a kundalini experience was just another metaphorical description of the process of enlightenment — a process I associated with expansion of awareness and states of bliss. I had no clue that a kundalini awakening could result in the sort of physical symptoms I had felt. Since any sense of the universe expanding was absent in my experience (I had already had such experiences dur­ing an expansion of awareness that had happened in my twenties), it seemed unlikely that kundalini could explain anything at all. And then I found the Indian mystic Gopi Krishna.

In his book Living with Kundalini Gopi Krishna recounted an experience that happened during his meditation practice when he was thirty-four. I imme­diately saw that his experience had many parallels with mine. Here is his description of the beginning of the event:

I suddenly felt a strange sensation below the base of the spine, at a place touching the seat . . . The sensation was extraordinary and so pleasing that my attention was forc­ibly drawn towards it.

Here is the description of the ascension when the force reached his brain:

Suddenly, with a roar like that of a waterfall, I felt a stream of liquid light entering my brain through the spinal cord.

And this describes his physical state when the event concluded:

When I opened my eyes and looked about, I felt a little dazed and bewildered, as if coming back from a strange land completely foreign to me ... I tried to lift my hands ... my arms felt limp and lifeless. With an effort I raised them up and stretched them to enable the blood to flow freely. Then I tried to free my legs from the posture in which I was sitting and to place them in a more comfort­able position, but could not. They were heavy and stiff. With the help of my hands I freed them and stretched them out, then put my back against the wall, reclining in a position of ease and comfort.

Further in my search for understanding I discov­ered the Hindu-Jain "sex" temples at Khajuraho, India. It quickly became clear that the hundreds of sexual images on the walls of the medieval religious buildings depicted the energetic process of sex but not orgasm. Could my own experience of delaying orgasm have accidentally triggered the lofty ancient purpose of Tan­tric sexual practice?

As I persevered in my investigation, I began to real­ize that the kundalini event had miraculously focused and connected many phenomena in my past that had before seemed disparate and scattered. 

At a very young age I became conscious of my chill reflex, I also noticed that it was triggered by thrilling or terrifying events. During my observations, I found the effect could be stifled or expanded. Eventually I learned to create the reaction at will.

I don't know exactly why I was drawn to explore it; possibly I just enjoyed the way it felt. When it came spontaneously, I tried to see how I could move or change it. Or, when I felt the desire, I would trigger and play with it for no reason at all. I found my first real use for it in my mid-teens, when I discovered acting. Since I knew this chill was something that occurred naturally at extreme moments, I began to experiment with creat­ing the effect at times my character was supposed to be experiencing extreme things. Although I intuited that this was a very appropriate thing to do, I really didn't have any objective feedback that it did anything at all for an audience. I'd guessed that it somehow amplified an emotion, yet while I received accolades and awards for my dramatic work during that period, I really didn't know if using the effect added anything at all to my characterizations.

Eventually I started to experiment with applying the chill to theatrical moments that would not naturally summon such a response. When I did this, I started to gain more insight into how it might work. For instance, if I summoned it before walking on stage as a master of ceremonies, I felt my on-stage energy go through the roof. During this experimentation I made a conscious effort to use it (or not) for similar events and came to believe that when I used it I definitely had more of the audience's attention then when I didn't. And yet I still had no real objective result that I could use to prove its value to anyone but myself. 

Further discoveries were largely absent during my college years, with one notable exception. During an acting class I was made aware of a method actor's stage triumph, which came from impeccably moving his audience during a scene in which he portrayed his character's suicide. Critics marveled at the chills they experienced as they watched his character move to his demise. When the actor was asked how he achieved his result (the moment was largely nonverbal, so there was little he could do with his voice to bring about the audi­ence's reaction), he explained that during his prepara­tion he realized he needed to understand how it felt to commit suicide. Since it was not expedient to actually kill himself, he created a kind of proxy experience using his bathroom shower. First he convinced himself that if the water from the icy cold shower touched him, he would die. He then ritualistically disrobed, stood under the shower head, and then "pulled the trigger" on the cold water.

He memorized his body's responses to this as well as the changes in his psychological states; he then attempted to reproduce the changes as a means to non-verbally communicate his character's suicide.

I understood immediately that doing what he did excited the same energies I was already exploring. The actor had used external means to excite the same effect I was becoming more and more competent at creat­ing with my mind. This was the first major validation that this unseen energy could move other people who had no clue it was in use. Yet for all the information I gained, I was completely unaware that this "suicide" was energetically very similar to processes that can cre­ate higher states of consciousness—a reality that would be very prominent in my near destiny.

In fact this theatrical lesson epically foreshadowed events that would expand my awareness by showing me the reality of a much larger universe. Before this period in my life I hadn't much use for nonmainstream thought. I was very engaged in the "reality" of com­merce and sought my destiny within its processes. Like a soldier, armed with the certainty of my perspective and buttressed with a great deal of energy for execut­ing its mandates, I assaulted the world in a way that I was sure would reap the rewards that were coming to me. Yet by my late twenties I was in a death struggle with unexpected and oppressive forces that were much more powerful than my ability to counter them. Having pushed my reality to its breaking point, I found myself in deep, dark, and painful meditation. It wasn't long before I came to the clear revelation that my impression of the universe did not work. I had decided that such a reality was not worth living. I was seconds away from physically acting on this decision when a miracle stilled my hand—a miracle that descended from nowhere and pulled me into a much larger universe. 

Unlike the character in the play, I had survived the dangerous penetration of my habitual way of looking at myself without physical suicide. I had discovered the irony that in many important ways the transit to a higher consciousness is very similar to suicide, except that what must die is the limited perception that unen­lightened consciousness mistakes for its universe. Unfortunately for most people this consciousness is solidly identified with their body. Thus when growth occurs beyond this immature stage of being, they often mistake the living body for their illusory identity—a mistake that easily causes them to aim their energy for transformation at the wrong target. Instead of using this intense evolutionary force to break the cocoon of ego-enforcing illusion, many mistakenly point the force at the living body that is identified with the illusion—and physical suicide is often the result. In my case I found that when this dangerous process had settled, I had for­ever escaped the limits of identity and was grounded in life's larger dimensions. As I fell into the blissful rev­elations gained from the unfolding heightened states of consciousness, I felt extended (but otherwise familiar) spontaneous chills.

The years after the initial awakening were a pro­found period of discovering the much larger universe I had fallen into. I energetically read all sorts of spiri­tual writings and philosophical and religious texts. Eventually I frequented a few esoteric and philosophi­cal organizations—subsequently staying to help lead at least two. 

During this initial period after my revelations, my first personal, objective evidence of the chill's effect on others showed itself. I was about to engage in a theatri­cal process, and as part of my preparation I brought the energy from the chill response up with all the force I could muster and then did everything possible to keep it going. A female friend standing next to me was chew­ing gum. When I was ready to move toward the place where I would sing, she opened her mouth and showed me that her chewing gum had turned to powder in her mouth. Although I never told her what I was doing (or when I was doing it), we were able to achieve the same "powdering" effect on several more occasions.

During this time I also noticed that something tangi­ble was beginning to radiate from my hands—an energy that other people could often feel. Although I had no clue what it could do, I delighted in involving others in my experimentation. I would begin by clasping my hands together and briefly rubbing them as if I were preparing to grip something heavy. I would then hold one of the hands (usually my right) over another per­son's upturned palm at a distance of two or three inches. Once it was in position, most people felt their skin begin to warm under my hand. As soon as this warmth pre­sented itself, both the observer and I could often feel a "pressure" that was felt to move in unison with my hand as I moved it back and forth and side to side.

It was about this same time that I would combine the chill effect with the effect of projecting the energy from my hands to enhance and magnify my presence at times of prayer. I made a practice of trying to keep the effect going as long as possible. I also started to become aware that the energy emanating from my hands had healing properties that could sometimes bring relief to other people's maladies. This was my state of being at the time the kundalini event occurred. 

A great difference between Gopi Krishna's experi­ence and my own is that his event started a very prob­lematic and dangerous period of his life. According to his account he drifted in and out of psychotic states and was often unable to feed himself. It took years before he was able to find enough balance to live a normal life. Perhaps I avoided the years of problems he expe­rienced because I had been unconsciously strengthen­ing myself and encouraging the experience since my childhood. Conversely, perhaps my kundalini ascension happened as some sort of a completion of the psychic transformations that were already well underway— or perhaps it is my destiny to experience similar sorts of complications at some time in the future. Whatever its final disposition, I recount my events now because I want to offer knowledge of this effect to others. I also hope to encourage a dialogue that may help me to gain further insight into my own process.


Andrew Nesky III is the president of the Theosophical Society in Pittsburgh. He has twice been elected to the position of Master of a Masonic Lodge and is a published writer. As an actor he has appeared in hundreds of performances on regional stages; he also lectures on metaphysics and human development and has coached high-school competitive public speaking. Andrew hosted the Webcasted talk show "Science and the Outer Streams," which investigates the frontiers of human thought, science, and spirituality; it can be viewed on YouTube by using the key words "Outer Streams:'


What I Know about Love: The Making of a Mystic

Printed in the Spring 2013 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Levine, Arlene Gay.
 "What I Know about Love: The Making of a Mystic" Quest  101. 2 (Spring 2013): pg. 62 - 63. 

 By Arlene Gay Levine

Theosophical Society -  Arlene Gay Levine, author of Thirty-Nine Ways to Open Your Heart: An Illuminated Meditation (Conan Press) and Movie Life (Finishing Line Press), has had poetry appear in many venues, including The New York Times, an off-Broadway show, and on CD. She served as a judge in the 2011 and 2012 Illinois State Poetry Society Contest.People tend to analyze love, calling it by various names: unconditional, patriotic, maternal, erotic, platonic, andsoon. Yet how can we accept any one aspect as a definition of love itself? If you are lucky enough to catch sight of a rainbow, you do not wish to stop and scruti­nize where a certain color begins and another ends. 

Love is the most complex word I know and the sim­plest. There are so many ways to understand and expe­rience it, yet for me the very first time I felt fully loved became the barometer for everything I would identify in this way afterwards. I was about six years old, sitting on my front porch around dusk, feeling, paradoxically, very unloved. My physician father was in his office busy with patients, my mother was ensconced in the kitchen with her radio and the dishes for company, my sister and brother were off in their rooms doing who knew what, and no friends were outside at that moment either. I began to stare at the sky, just then morphing from blue to purple; it matched my mood.

My young mind, caught up in the illusion of lone­liness, began to think how unfair it was that no one seemed to care about me. An enormous longing welled up in what I now know to be the area of my heart chakra. Overwhelmed, I cried quietly for a while until my anger at what I believed to be the injustice of a world so willing to abandon me was sated. Then, empty of that pain, I simply sat and observed. 

The theatre of vast blue fading fast, casting new shades of splendor on the moments-ago-green grass was a magic show, punctuated here and there by grace­ful dancers, trees bowing in the early evening breeze. This same gentle wind caressing my cheek drew me into the performance. Time passed unnoticed. A sooth­ing chant from the insect chorus playing background music for the gradual descent of the sun easily replaced my earlier sense of separateness with a new and com­forting feeling: oneness with my surroundings. Breath­ing deeply of earthy incense, I belonged to this world and it belonged to me.

Though I would not have described it in these words at the time, I felt a part of it all, safe, loved, and cared for by something larger than I had ever imagined before. The cavity of my chest filled with a kind of glow that grew as I sent my love back to the sights, fragrance, feelings, and sounds that had inspired this unity. In the act of appreciating and mirroring creation's beauty back to itself, I had my first experience of what I believe to be love.

As I grew up, it became apparent that every day is full of opportunities for giving and receiving, moving from our loneliness as humans to find deeper forms of connecting with each other and the world that sur­rounds us. It is as if on this planet there really are only two rooms; in the first, we dwell together, and in the other we are essentially alone.  

There is much beauty and also great sorrow in the latter abode. No matter how many souls come and go or how much they may mean to us, those cherished ones are like the golden leaves of autumn, sweet corn con­sumed, or the passing scent of rose on a warm summer afternoon—all lovely, all transient. Yet in love's room, alive with a blaze more brilliant than the sun, we are one: a part of love as well as everything that is, was, or will be.  

Every day we wake up with a chance to see the world, to inhabit this room, in a new way. With dis­cipline and an enduring longing, we can follow the clues that reveal why the bursting heart of childhood is so soon stilled by those who had their innocence—their innate, intuitive link with the divine as it mani­fests here on earth and beyond—early tampered with too. As we flow from youthful phases to more enlight­ened levels, our lives are like unwrapping a gift that a dear one has exquisitely sequestered in plain sight. This dear one is Spirit, and the layers of illusion are lifted through the lessons involved in living our days, generously nurtured by a rich and often difficult har­vest, until we grow into our authentic Self, who is none other than love.  


 Arlene Gay Levine, author of Thirty-Nine Ways to Open Your Heart: An Illuminated Meditation (Conan Press) and Movie Life (Finishing Line Press), has had poetry appear in many venues, including The New York Times, an off-Broadway show, and on CD. She served as a judge in the 2011 and 2012 Illinois State Poetry Society Contest. Her article "Seasonal Poetry: A Path through the Woods" appeared in Quest, Spring 2011. Visit her Web site at www.arlenegaylevine.com/.

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Gay and Lesbian Love

Printed in the Spring 2013 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation:
Christensen, David. "Gay and Lesbian Love" Quest  101. 2 (Spring 2013): pg. 59 - 61.

By David Christensen

Theosophical Society - DAVID CHRISTENSEN joined the Theosophical Society in 1944. His family lived at Olcott in "the little white house on the corner" (of Main and Cole Street) from 1937 to 1950. In the '50s he went to the newly opened Happy Valley School, now called Besant Hill School, in Ojai, California, and to the TS Camp Indralaya on Orcas Island in Washington state, where he fell in love with the Northwest. He served two six-year terms on the board of the camp. He has been active in the gay community and has been an AIDS activist.To sit down and write an article on love is a daunting task. With so many authors and great books providing interpretations of love and all that goes with it, who am Ito presume I can add to such a bibliography? Well, I'm a gay man who has experienced same-sex love.

I am also a man who has had meaningful, non­sexual, loving relationships with people of both gen­ders. As I see it, love is love and can exist with or without sex. But this article is about exploring love in the gay and lesbian community, so let me address this directly.

To begin with, let's review some familiar terms. Gay is a word that has become synonymous with homosex­ual (to the annoyance of some) and is often used for both sexes. However, many female homosexuals prefer the word lesbian, so in this article I use both terms. Although gays and lesbians as groups each have some unique issues, I'm not going to address those here, because I feel the basic subject of homosexual love applies to both gays and lesbians.

Out, as in being out or coming out, refers to being open about one's gay or lesbian sexuality—to oneself, to a person, or to a group.

Being closeted or in the closet refers to hiding one's gay or lesbian sexuality.

Homophobia refers to a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuals, such as antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, irrational fear, and hatred.

For a general perspective on homosexuality, let's look at these facts. The American Community Survey of the 2000 U.S. census estimated that in the top ten U.S. metropolitan areas ranked by population, 5.8 to 15.4 percent of the population identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Of course, making such an estimate is particularly challenging with this population, since many people are not comfortable with their sexuality and so wouldn't admit they were homosexual when asked, even if they were out to themselves. Tak­ing an average of 10 percent, this would mean there are about 30 million in the United States. Just to bring these statistics closer to home, in the Theosophical Society worldwide there would be perhaps 2600 (given an esti­mated membership of 26,000).

So homosexuals are obviously a minority, but a dif­ferent kind of minority—one that's often unseen. If as a gay man I choose to hide my gayness, I can usually do that. This choice makes being gay or lesbian quite dif­ferent from being African-American, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American. Of course, there are homosexuals who are also members of racial minorities, and these people undoubtedly face a double whammy at times.

On the scientific front, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the World Health Organization have all stated that homosexuality is not a mental disorder. It's generally accepted that homosexuality is not a learned behavior. One can't be recruited. Furthermore, curing homosexu­ality doesn't work because there is nothing to cure. It would be akin to curing left-handedness.

Throughout history, homosexuals have been dis­criminated against in various ways: shunning, depriv­ing them of their human rights, outright verbal and physical abuse, imprisonment, and even death. The Nazis considered homosexuals to be worse than Jews, forcing them to wear a pink triangle, which has since become a symbol for the gay/lesbian community. Today hate crimes still occur, but at least now they are usually tracked and prosecuted in most Western countries. 

By far the most important source of such discrimi­natory treatment is religious doctrine. Many sects of Islam and Judaism as well as some Christian faiths condemn homosexuality, and in Buddhism and Hindu­ism there seem to be mixed feelings toward same-sex relationships. So imagine being brought up in a reli­gious environment where you are taught that same-sex relationships are a sin, an abomination, even perhaps a capital crime—and then coming to the realization that you are one of them!

Because of homophobia and discrimination, homo­sexuals can have a particularly hard time acknowledg­ing their sexuality. It's impossible to grow up without recognizing that being gay or lesbian presents, at the least, unique problems.

It became clear to me early on in my coming out pro­cess that coming out did not just take place in a moment in time. I used to think that the answer to the question `Are you out?" was either yes or no. But coming out is a lifelong process. I still find myself in situations where I have to decide if it's important to be out as a gay man.

The first step in a homosexual's coming out process is coming out to oneself. Depending on the individual there can be a period of denial, where one might say to oneself, "Oh, all I need to do is find the right woman" (or man for a lesbian) or "Maybe I'll grow out of this." In some cases this may be true, but for most homosexu­als that won't happen. Then comes the recognition that "It's true ... I'm gay (or lesbian)," and this admission can be traumatic, often leading to self-hate.

While for some it is hard, the goal of coming out to oneself is to be able to say "It's OK to be gay or lesbian" and believe it.

Of course the next step, revealing yourself to family, friends, and others, often brings you right up against an environment that rejects homosexuality. I worked at a Seattle human service agency whose mission was helping high-risk youth— street kids. There was a high percentage of gay/lesbian-identified kids in this group. Most arrived on the street because of rejection in their home environment, in their school, or in their church. It was not uncommon to work with a kid whose parents had kicked their child out of their home because of his or her sexuality. I ran across more than one case where the parents actually drove their kids downtown and made them get out of the car.

Finally, we come to the matter of dating and finding a love partner. An important step in this quest is to be comfortable with your own sexuality. But beyond that, just finding someone to love can be difficult, particu­larly if one lives in area where there isn't a defined gay or lesbian community. 

There is a level of risk in exploring a relationship. Before you even come to the potentials for rejec­tion found in straight dating, there is the potential of rejection right up front that isn't found in a more tra­ditional coupling. It's the question "Is he (or she) gay (or lesbian)?" From my experience and the experiences of many gay and lesbian friends, this question is very difficult. With it you're coining out to this person, and if the person is straight, the response could be pretty ugly, even homophobic. This question is sometimes so troublesome that it keeps a homosexual single. While being single is not necessarily a bad thing, it is bad if the singleness persists because the person cannot get around this question.

Fortunately, in recent years more options have become available for meeting a same-sex partner. Gay and lesbian bars are still very much around, and it larger cities there are gay/lesbian social groups and events, many alcohol- and drug-free. Some religious denominations, like the Quakers and the Unitarians offer gay/lesbian activities. It's perhaps hard for straight person to imagine the feeling of walking into a gay or lesbian activity and realizing that this "Are you gay?" question is suddenly redundant. For me it amazing!

Being in a same-sex relationship doesn't remove the risk of homophobia. You're always aware that so people will have very negative reactions to a same sex couple. Coming out to your group of friends, your workplace, your church or synagogue, your Theosophical lodge—each of these presents a risk. Even walking into a restaurant in Middle America with your same sex partner can be scary. I guarantee you that my partner and I will act very differently going into a café in Seattle than into a restaurant in rural America. I was recently traveling in rural South Dakota, and though I was alone, I was very much aware that I had to watch myself and not display any gay flags as I went into diner for lunch.

How do you talk about your relationship, say at work? You may not be out as a gay/lesbian there, so how do you talk about the most important person in your life or respond when everyone else talks about their traditional relationships? And how do your parents react to all this? There are many sad stories of parents who reject their child's same-sex partner.

Fortunately, as I found in Seattle, there are support groups, particularly in larger cities. Some church are now very accepting of same-sex couples. Some performing same-sex marriage ceremonies. Same-sex marriage has also become a political issue. Some states have or are close to having laws that allow same-sex marriage, and President Obama has voiced his support of these laws.

What role did Theosophy play in helping me t accept my sexuality? I was raised in a Theosophical family. I learned, more by osmosis than by book study, the basic principles and concepts of Theosophy, such as brotherhood, the oneness of all life, the evolutionary journey of the soul, reincarnation, karma, and the multidimensional nature of the human being. 

But I got next to no spiritual guidance about emotions and bodily desires. Although my parents were idealistic and loving, I think they were just bound by societal taboos against talking about sex as other parents of my generation. I don't recall any con­versations about sex education at home or indeed dis­cussions about sexuality of any sort with Theosophists. So as I was becoming aware of my sexuality I looked for answers everywhere. I can remember going to the high school library and looking at all the books that had cita­tions on homosexuality. I didn't find much. I searched my Theosophical background to see if there were clues there. I didn't find any except what I considered to be a flip comment: "Well, maybe you were a woman in your last life." And while in some cases that could be true, my response to that was, "No, you don't get it. I'm a guy who likes guys."

I had and have true friends in Seattle—many The­osophists as well as people I met at the Theosophical Camp Indralaya on Orcas Island, Washington. One would think that such people would be relatively easy to come out to.

Not for me. Why? Because I couldn't yet see among them any support for me as a gay man, despite their relative lack of homophobia. So I found an open gay support and discussion group. There I made Mends with guys who had some sense of spirituality. I finally was able to date. It was still some time, though, before I could start the coming out process with my family and my longtime friends in the TS and at Camp Indralaya.

I remember one night at the Indralaya campfire when I was going to sing a love song I had written with same-sex lyrics. I usually sang the song in its straight version at camp. With the encouragement of a friend to whom I was out, I finally had the nerve to sing it with the gay lyrics. What happened? Well, not much. I think most listeners didn't notice, but some did and came up afterward and gave me a very accept­ing hug. I was finally able to take my then-partner up to Indralaya, and we could be there as an openly gay couple. It may not sound like a big deal, but it sure was to me.

Although I felt that my Theosophical background hadn't given me much guidance or understanding in terms of coming out, later I found it was extremely helpful when living through the AIDS crisis. It didn't explain to me why this was happening, but I could look at the events with a broader perspective that included reincarnation and karma. My Indralaya contacts with Dora Kunz and her teachings of Therapeutic Touch were particularly meaningful. Learning to channel the healing energy from a spiritual source rather than using my own energy was also useful and valuable. In 1991 I wrote an article titled "Living with AIDS" for The American Theosophist about my experiences in this crisis. 

 How can or should the Theosophical Society deal with the issue of homosexuality? Indralaya and many lodges are accepting of gays and lesbians. But that acceptance is of gays and lesbians who are out. I think the TS must be willing to discuss homosexuality and be openly supportive of gays and lesbians. This would show even closeted gays or lesbians that they are in a safe place, a place where they can come out to an accepting and supportive group of people. I think that for most TS members this would not be difficult, though I've been told that the Esoteric School of Theosophy is quite uncomfortable with the subject. But as I've come out to my Theosophical friends, with very few excep­tions, I have felt complete acceptance.

There might be a case for the inclusion of sexual ori­entation in the First Object of the Society, which speaks of a "universal brotherhood of humanity, without dis­tinction of race, creed, sex, caste, or color." While it would be interesting to see how the membership would respond to such a suggestion, the time is probably not right for this. But I do think it would be appropriate for individual lodges to have discussions on how Theo­sophy and Theosophists can support their gay/lesbian members. This could be a time of acceptance as well as a time of self-searching to see how we feel about this minority. I think it would be a time of discovery.

Lastly, I return to my overarching topic of love and ask the question, do all the issues I discussed above make the love in a same-sex couple different? No, I truly believe that a gay/lesbian love relationship is fundamentally the same as love between a man and a woman. There are all the joys, excitement, anxieties, tragedies, sadness, and spiritual ties in gay/lesbian love that are found in straight love. And in gay/lesbian lit­erature the love stories are being written. 

I don't think there's a gay Romeo and Juliet yet that will compete with Shakespeare's, but perhaps in time...


DAVID CHRISTENSEN joined the Theosophical Society in 1944. His family lived at Olcott in "the little white house on the corner" (of Main and Cole Street) from 1937 to 1950. In the '50s he went to the newly opened Happy Valley School, now called Besant Hill School, in Ojai, California, and to the TS Camp Indralaya on Orcas Island in Washington state, where he fell in love with the Northwest. He served two six-year terms on the board of the camp. He has been active in the gay community and has been an AIDS activist. He served for three years as a commissioner for the city of Seattle working with its gay/lesbian affairs office. He currently lives in Port Townsend, Washington,


Born to be Lovers

Printed in the Spring 2013 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation:
Creech, Jimmy. "Born to be Lovers" Quest  101. 2 (Spring 2013): pg. 54 - 58.

By Jimmy Creech

Theosophical Society - JIMMY CREECH was an ordained elder in The United Methodist Church from 1970 to 1999. He holds a bachelor of arts in biblical studies from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master of divinity from the Divinity School of Duke University. Mr. Creech is the author of two books: Rise above the Law: The Appeal to the Jury, The United Methodist Church's Trial of Jimmy Creech, and Adam's Gift: A Memoir of a Pastor's Calling to Defy the Church's Persecution of Lesbians and GaysThroughout my twenty-nine years as an ordained minister in The United Methodist Church, among my greatest joys was conducting weddings. Every couple was different—some young and some old, some marrying for the first time and some for a second, some rich and some poor, some gay and some nongay— yet their love for each other and their hope for the life they would share were the same. For me, no matter how vul­nerable and tenuous (for all things human are), the love that brought the couples together was the reality of God in their lives—and in the world.

When I counseled couples prior to their weddings, I reminded them that I would not "marry" them, and neither would the church or state. The love they had for each other and the commitment they made in their most intimate moments created their marriage long before any public ceremony or legal recognition.

On Sunday, September 14, 1997, in the sanctuary of First United Methodist Church, Omaha, Nebraska, I conducted a wedding ceremony for Mary and Martha. It was a simple but profoundly moving event: two per­sons pledged their love and faith to each other before their families, friends, and God. I prayed God's bless­ings upon them; I prayed that their life together and their home would be filled with God's grace and peace. Their union was recognized by neither the church nor the state. Nonetheless, it was a sacred and solemn moment that honored the marriage they had created.

On Monday morning, all hell broke out in The  United Methodist Church. My bishop, Joel Martinez, informed me that more than 150 complaints against  me had been filed in his office, accusing me of "disobedience to the Order and Discipline of The United Methodist Church" because I'd conducted a wedding ceremony for two women. The bishop chose one of the complaints to represent them all and initiated a judicial  process that would ultimately end in a church trial in March 1998. While I would be acquitted in this trial, I was found guilty in a second trial in 1999, and my cre­dentials of ordination in The United Methodist Church were taken from me for conducting another wedding  for a same-gender couple.

Just one year before Mary and Martha's ceremony, the General Conference of The United Methodist Church had adopted language prohibiting its clergy from conducting union ceremonies for same-gender couples. I was in strong disagreement with this pro­hibition and had informed Bishop Martinez and the lay leadership of First United Methodist Church that I would conduct Mary and Martha's wedding in spite of the prohibition. Mary and Martha were members of  First Church and deserved to have their loving commit­ment to each other honored and recognized in the con­text of their faith community. To deny them this would have been an injustice and expression of bigotry.

I strongly disagreed with my church on same-gender marriage and felt compelled to celebrate cer­emonies for lesbian and gay couples because of Adam, who confided to me in April 1984 that he was gay. At the time, I was the pastor of a United Methodist church in Warsaw, North Carolina. I'd known and worked with Adam in the church for three years before and was surprised to learn he was gay. He came out to me when he informed me that he was leaving the church because of its antigay policies. He was in his late forties and had been a Methodist all of his life. But he would take the abuse no longer. His decision to leave caused him deep anguish. His revelation changed my life and ministry. I tell this story in my book Adam's Gift: A Memoir of a Pastor's Calling to Defy the Church's Persecution of Les­bians and Gays.

Adam was a leader in the church and community. He was generous, gentle, and kind, a person of deep and devout faith He did not fit the stereotype I had about homosexuals. My attitude and understanding of homo­sexuality was negative, a prejudice shaped entirely by the heterosexism and homophobia of the Southern cul­ture in which I lived, a prejudice I had accepted with­out critical reflection. I assumed gay people would be psychologically unhealthy and physically dangerous. And before Adam I'd never talked with anyone who self-identified as gay.

Adam did not destroy my assumptions about gay people by offering a new interpretation of the Bible or some theological insight. He destroyed them with his dignity, with his character. My prejudice had no defense against the integrity of his humanity.

After Adam came out to me, I reflected on my per­sonal history, about what I'd learned about homosexu­ality and about how I developed my negative attitude toward gay people. I first learned about homosexuality when I was a boy from what my friends said about Pee­-wee. They said he was a "queer." Nobody explained to me what that meant, except to say that "queers do bad things to little boys like you." I sensed this meant some­thing violent and sexual in nature. Pee-wee was four or five years older than I, and I feared him. As I grew into adulthood, my fear was never challenged.

But Adam's humanity banished my childhood fear of Pee-wee and pushed me beyond my personal experi­ence to study and search for a deeper understanding about the basis for the religious and cultural prejudice against homosexuality. My undergraduate degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was in biblical studies. The issue of homosexuality in the Bible was never discussed during my four years of study. Nor was it discussed during my three years of study at the Divinity School of Duke University Nevertheless, I had accepted without question the conventional claim that the Bible says homosexuality is a sin.

Eager to understand, I studied every piece of bibli­cal scholarship I could find on the subject. At the end, my conclusion was that there is no legitimate use of the Bible to condemn same-gender-loving people and their sexual intimacy. There are a few passages (only four that are clear: Genesis 19:1-29; Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13; and Romans 1:26-27) that refer to same-gender sexual activity. In each case, the sexual activity is con­demned because it happens within the context of either violent rape or idolatry. There is no reference to same­-gender-loving sexual relationships in the Bible, so it cannot be said the Bible condemns them. My search for what the Bible says about homosexuality provided no basis for the claim that it is a sin. Same-gender sexual relationships simply are not an issue within the Bible.

In addition, there was no understanding of sexual orientation in biblical times. Homosexuality, heterosex­uality, and bisexuality are variances in sexual orienta­tion that were discovered during the late 1800s through the emerging science of psychology. Only then were these words created to describe the different categories of sexual orientation, a newly discovered innate aspect of the human personality. This is another reason it is false to claim that the Bible says homosexuality is a sin: there was no understanding of sexual orientation and consequently no words in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek for homosexuality in biblical times. We cannot say the Bible condemns something that its writers didn't know about. Medical science and psychology have evolved in understanding sexual orientation so that today there is a consensus that homosexuality, heterosexuality, and bisexuality are equally normal, natural, and healthy aspects of the human personality.

In Adam's Gift, I observe:

The way the Bible has been used against gay people is not unique. It has been misused in similar ways to support other cultural prejudices, practices and institutions, such as slavery, racism, anti-Semitism, sexism, wars, inquisi­tions, colonialism, and classism. Such misuse does not serve the biblical understanding of God, Christ, or the church. Each misuse, along with the bigotry against gay, lesbian, and bisexual persons, is an offense against God, assaults the souls of God's children, and compromises the ability of the church to be a faithful witness to Jesus Christ. Any use of God's name to condemn the essential humanity of any people is blasphemous. (Creech, 36)

When I did not find the basis for the cultural prej­udice against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in the Bible, I turned to the history of the Christian church for the answer and was not disappointed.

When Emperor Constantine I of Rome officially ended the persecution of the Christian church with the Edict of Milan (313 cr) and gave it favored status, the church fathers [it was an exclusive all-male club] began putting together the first systematic Christian theology. They were obsessed with sexuality. They abandoned the Jewish view that God's creation—the earth and all that dwells upon it—was good; that a human being is a unity of body and spirit; and that sexuality is a blessed gift for lovemaking, shared pleasure, and childbearing. Marriage was discour­aged; virginity and chastity were honored. Because many of the early church fathers were monks or hermits, at one time or another in their careers, their views of sex were dominated by ascetic values. Asceticism became the pre­ferred way to commune with God. Because they believed a human being was a spirit trapped in a body, the pre­eminent challenge for Christians seeking eternal salvation was to deprive and conquer the physical appetites, espe­cially the erotic. (Creech, 38)

The church father whose views on sexuality most influenced the early Christian church's teachings was Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE). As a young man, before his conversion to Christianity, he was influenced by Manichaeism and Neoplatonism, both dualistic phi­losophies that considered the physical world to be cor­rupt and evil, in contrast to the spiritual world, which was regarded as good. Sexuality was physical and con­sequently sinful. Augustine was the first to associate the fall of Adam and Eve with sexuality, which he regarded as the original sin. He believed sexual desire was the foulest of human wickednesses. Begetting children was the only acceptable excuse for sexual intimacy. None­theless, sexual pleasure was always a sin. He was not alone in his negative view of sexuality, and his teaching about it became the standard for the Christian church during the Middle Ages and beyond.

Augustine's teaching separated spirituality and sexuality.

When spirituality is understood as our capacity to con­nect with and love the Holy, the neighbor, and the nat­ural world, and sexuality is understood as the way we embody ourselves in the world, then spirituality and sexuality are inseparable and interdependent. Sexuality is the embodiment of our connection with realities beyond our individual selves: our spirituality. Spirituality deter­mines the character and values of our embodiment: our sexuality. When the unity of sexuality and spirituality was denied, spirituality was disembodied and sexuality reduced to a physical appetite narrowly defined as lust. Sexual intimacy, consequently, was separated from love and approved only as a necessary evil for the sole purpose of procreation. (Creech, 39)

In his book, Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medi­eval Europe, James Brundage observes:

Writers [i.e., medieval Christian theologians] who place primary emphasis on sex as reproduction, therefore, con­demn homosexual relations as well as heterosexual oral and anal sex practices and often maintain that even the postures used in marital sex are morally good or bad depending on whether they hinder or promote conception. Those who consider reproduction the primary cri­terion of sexual morality usually deny any positive value to sexual pleasure . . . Hence they minimize the value of sexual satisfaction as a binding mechanism in marriage. (Brundage, 580)

In the thirteenth century, theologian and philoso­pher Thomas Aquinas expanded on Augustine's view and specifically categorized same-gender-loving peo­ple as sinners. Aquinas used neither the Bible nor the teachings of Jesus to do this. He used instead the philosophy of Aristotle, who lived some 300 years before Jesus. Aristotle proposed that using something according to its design or purpose is good and using something contrary to its design or purpose is evil. Aquinas applied this philosophical theorem to sexual ethics, claiming, as had Augustine, that the sole design and purpose of sexual intimacy was procreation. Same­gender-loving people were then, by definition, sinners and unwelcome.

In Sex in History, Reay Tannahill writes:

Just as Augustine ... had given a rationale to the Church Fathers' distaste for the heterosexual act and rendered it acceptable only in terms of procreation, so Thomas Aqui­nas consolidated traditional fears of homosexuality as the crime that had brought down fire and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah, by "proving" what every hetero­sexual male had always believed—that it was as unnatural in the sight of God as of man ... Homosexuality was thus, by definition, a deviation from the natural order laid down by God . . . and a deviation that was not only unnatural but, by the same Augustinian token, lustful and hereti­cal ... From the fourteenth century on, homosexuals as a group were to find neither refuge nor tolerance anywhere in the Western Church or state. (Tannahill, 159--60)

Aquinas's view of sexuality was made the official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church, and homopho­bia was institutionalized. Soon after, church laws were enacted that condemned same-gender sexual intimacy, and civil laws became widespread in Europe calling for the violent execution of people caught in or believed to be guilty of it.

"The appalling truth," I conclude in Adam's Gift, 

is that the dominant expression of Christian sexual moral­ity that shaped Western culture over the last two mil­lennia, affecting both intimate relationships and social institutions, was formulated during the historical period known as the Dark Ages by celibate men who believed the physical world to be evil, held women in contempt, considered pleasure a vice, and equated sex with sin. They could not have taken us further from Jesus. The course they established led tragically in the wrong direction for the spiritual evolution of humanity. In spite of a vastly superior knowledge of human sexuality, we continue to be victims of their medieval ignorance, fear, and prejudice embedded in the teachings of the Christian church and in archaic civil laws. More tragic than the external violence done to bisexual, gay, and lesbian people is the fact that they have been taught by the Christian church and the society that it has shaped for centuries to hate themselves and believe themselves to be rejected by and separated from God because of their sexuality, because of who they are and whom they love. The Christian antipathy toward same-gender sexual loving comes from the fear of sexual­ity, not from the Bible. Because of this fear, gay, lesbian, and bisexual people have been oppressed, persecuted, and killed in the name of God and in defense of society. It's a scandalous and shameful history. (Creech, 40)

With this new understanding of the Bible, human sexuality, and church history, I began to challenge my church's teachings and policies about same-gender-lov­ing people. As a pastor, my responsibility was to help people overcome whatever damaged them spiritually—whatever diminished their capacity to trust God's love, to love others, and to love themselves. After Adam came out to me, I discovered my church was teaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual people to fear God's judgment, to fear loving another intimately, and to hate themselves for being who they are. I believe the church cannot be an authentic witness to God's love when it is persecuting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.

Sexual orientation—whether it is toward the same gender, different gender or both genders—involves more than behavior for sexual gratification. It's a pre­disposition toward persons of a particular gender for romantic or emotional attraction and bonding. Sexual orientation is primarily about relationships, not behav­ior. It's about whom one loves, chooses to marry, and creates a family with. To label as sin a person's capacity for a healthy, adult, loving relationship is an act of spiri­tual violence. Sexual intimacy is one physical way we express our love and commitment, one way we create and sustain the marriage bond.

In the spring of 1990, James and Timothy asked me to conduct a holy union ceremony for them. They attended worship at Fairmont United Methodist Church in Raleigh, North Carolina, where I was then the pastor. They had been together for several years and owned a home together. James was an educator and Timothy, a landscape architect. The celebration of their commitment to each other would be in the back­yard garden that Timothy had planted and tended at their home. I accepted their invitation with delight. I would later write about it:

While conducting a holy union for two men was a new experience for me, I didn't think of it as controversial. In fact, it was a rather traditional Christian thing to do. How could I recognize and affirm gay people as individuals without recognizing, affirming and supporting their loving committed relationships? Civil and religious authorities may deny them recognition, but none can invalidate a relationship grounded in love and integrity. Such ground­ing is the very reality of God, the ultimate authority and blessing. James and Timothy's holy union ceremony, using the traditional United Methodist marriage liturgy with the Eucharist, was the first of many [same-gender weddings] that I would conduct over the remaining years of my min­istry. (Creech, 77)

It was because of the dignity and integrity of the couples whose loving commitments I celebrated over the years that I could not and would not comply with my church's prohibition of such ceremonies when Mary and Martha invited me to conduct theirs in 1997.

In 1998, I was invited to preach at The Riverside Church in New York City. In my sermon, "Free to Love without Fear," I told the story of Mary and Martha's covenant ceremony and reflected on its theological significance. I explained that their religious traditions had taught them that God had rejected and condemned them because of who they were and whom they loved. To survive, they left their homes, families, and, they believed, God. Ultimately, their separate journeys brought them to Omaha, Nebraska, where they found each other and a God who had loved them all along. It was, I said,

. . like a homecoming. Not a return to a home they had left behind, but a coming for the first time to a home they had been denied by the religious traditions in which they grew up. While they thought they left God, God never left them. God was the power within each of them that would not let them deny themselves, that nudged them to leave behind the dishonesty and embrace and honor their true selves as a sacred gift. This was God's active gracious love. It did not come from their religious training, nor from the expectations of family and friends. It came from the deep­est place within their souls that knew the truth. This is what we Methodists call "prevenient grace," the grace of God, the love of God that comes to us even before we know it's there, and claims, embraces, and empowers us Mary and Martha's covenant ceremony was a victory of faith and love over fear and oppression. It was a sign that they had individually survived their long tortuous journeys and were finally able to love themselves. Once able to love themselves, they were able to love each other. Finally, they were free to love without fear. The Christian church must no longer demand that the Marys and Marthas of the world remain in the closet of fear, rejection, and self-hatred. No, the Christian church must join God in offering to all lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender peo­ple the assurance of what God has already done: blessed them and their loving with dignity and honor. When I prayed God's blessing upon Mary and Martha, I was only voicing what God already had done. By God's grace, they had been set free from fear and free to love. (Creech, 284)

To be a lover is what it means to be created in God's image. The capacity to love is not just a gift from God. It is God's presence alive and active in our very beings. We are not meant to be alone. It's basic to who we are as human beings to move out of ourselves to bond with someone, and to care for, nurture, empower, and pro­tect the ones we love. We embody God, when we love. There is no such thing as an unholy love.

The freedom to love without fear and judgment is a human right than cannot be denied to anyone by law, religion, or culture. No government, religion, or cultural convention has the authority to tell us whom we cannot love. We are all born to be lovers, free and fearless.


Sources

Brundage, James. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval

Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Creech, Jimmy. Adam's Gift: A Memoir of a Pastor's Callingto Defy the Church's Persecution of Lesbians and Gays.Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2011.

Tannahill, Reay. Sex in History. Rev. ed. Chelsea, Mich.:

 

A native of Goldsboro, North Carolina, JIMMY CREECH was an ordained elder in The United Methodist Church from 1970 to 1999. He holds a bachelor of arts in biblical studies from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master of divinity from the Divinity School of Duke University. Mr. Creech is the author of two books: Rise above the Law: The Appeal to the Jury, The United Methodist Church's Trial of Jimmy Creech (Swing Bridge Press, 2000), and Adam's Gift: A Memoir of a Pastor's Calling to Defy the Church's Persecution of Lesbians and Gays, published by Duke University Press in 2011.


Not Another New Age!

Printed in the Spring 2013 issue of Quest magazine. 
Citation: Bloom, William
. "Not Another New Age!" Quest  101. 2 (Spring 2013): pg. 50 - 53.

By William Bloom

Theosophical Society - WILLIAM BLOOM is a modern Western mystic and considered by many to be Britain's leading and most experienced mind-body-spirit teacher. He is the founder of Spiritual Companions. He cofounded and directed the famous Alternatives Program of St. James's Church, Piccadilly, London. For thirty years he was a senior faculty member of Europe's leading green and spiritual community, the Findhorn Foundation. He is the author of many books, including the influential The Endorphin Effect, Psychic Protection, and most recently The Power of the New Spirituality (Quest Books)It was embarrassing when I read Norman Cohn's book The Pursuit of the Millennium and discovered that, decade by decade for centuries, there had been many groups of crackpots claiming that a new age or an apocalypse was imminent. 

My embarrassment deepened when, as a mature student, I took a degree at the London School of Economics, studied social anthropology, and learned that it was normal for excited groups of people, including scholars and intellectuals, to make extravagant claims, some of which have led to religious cults. In particular, I squirmed when I read about cargo cults, a phenomenon that occurred when previously isolated tribal peoples met European explorers for the first time and thought they were gods sent from heaven. 

Before learning about these common social and cultural movements, influenced by altered states of consciousness and reading many books, I had been naively confident that we were living at the beginning of a New Age. I had experienced the 1960s and Flower Power, with its anthem about the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. Then I took a two-year retreat beginning in 1972, disappearing into the High Atlas Mountains of southern Morocco to perform the six-month ritual of Abramelin the Mage, which is designed to enable the practitioner to obtain knowledge of and conversation with his holy guardian angel. (For an account of my retreat see my book, The Sacred Magician: The Diary of a Ceremonial Magician, Glastonbury, U.K.: Gothic Image, 1992.) I also read a weighty trunk full of esoteric books including the major works of H.P. Blavatsky, C.W. Leadbeater, Annie Besant, and Alice Bailey. In all of these substantial texts, there was a underlying and recurring message that humanity was in the process of a cosmic growth spurt and all was about to change. I felt that they explained and described my own personal experience of the zeitgeist. It was obvious, wasn't it? Everything was changing. 

I wrote about the New Age. I started a New Age community. I edited the first anthology of New Age writings for a television series for Britain's Channel Four. I became part of the faculty at Europe's leading New Age center, the Findhorn Foundation. I helped start a major New Age program at St. James's Church, Piccadilly, in London. I befriended leading New Age thinkers such as David Spangler and Eileen Caddy. I became a speaker at academic conferences on the New Age.

Yet in reflective moments I could not ignore the psychological, historical, and anthropological insights. Perhaps this New Age was just another myth, another cargo cult, layered on top of irrational human arousal.

There were also realistic questions to be asked, such as, is our age more significant than the Stone Age, Iron Age, Ice Age, the settling of hunter-gatherers, the Reformation, the Renaissance, or the Industrial Revolution? Certainly there are some profound social and cultural shifts, notably the dismantling of ageism, sexism, patriarchy, and racism, as well as the information technology revolution, which has created the global village. These are important significators, but do they constitute a New Age? 

The Theosophical approach presents us with a really grand cosmic claim that humanity is experiencing the most significant shift in the whole of its history. At the core of this claim is a cosmic map and humanity's crucial role within it. To state the obvious first, this map contains the basic premise that we human beings are souls in incarnation. We have personalities, but these are just temporary vehicles for identities that are far more enduring and meaningful. Moreover, our souls"sparks emerging from a divine and cosmic breath"are not only individual but are also part of a collective endeavor. The purpose of this endeavor is to anchor spirit "compassion, benevolence, and unconditional love"into the dense matter of earth. We are all souls, incarnate in flesh and blood vehicles, and we are, so to speak, on a collective mission sent by deity.

This process is a long journey of experience, learning, and development for all of us. Beginning as innocent and unrealized waves or sparks of love, moving through cycles of incarnation, we develop and manifest consciousness, compassion, and wisdom"until finally it is our individual destiny to manifest an incarnation so radiant with consciousness and love that we are freed from the cycle of reincarnation, freed from samsara, and join the community of liberated adepts, bodhisatwas, and realized Masters of Wisdom.

At the very core of this process is a cosmic intention. We, as souls, are agents of spirit, bringing the resonance of love and new consciousness down into dense matter. This story is told not only in Theosophy but also in Tibetan Buddhism, the Vedas, Gnostic Christianity, Kabbalah, Sufism, the Western and Middle Eastern Mysteries, and other esoteric traditions. It is told too in the symbolism of myths about fallen angels and slain solar deities. Our purpose as souls is to bring love into matter and revibrate it. And this is happening within a greater context and set of relationships in which earth is connected to the other planets in our solar system, and our solar system is linked with other stars and constellations. (For a detailed explanation of these planetary chains and cycles see H.P. Blavatsky's Secret Doctrine as well as Alice Bailey's Treatise on Cosmic Fire and Esoteric Astrology.) Within this context, we human souls are playing out a role that is significant not just for each of us personally but also for our solar system and beyond. 

This long process begins with a cycle that lasts millions of years as our souls seek to land and anchor fully into earthy matter. In Theosophy this long first stage is called the involutionaly, cycle. The crucial claim made by Blavatsky and Bailey is that the involutionary cycle is today finally beginning to achieve its purpose: the vibration of our souls"the resonance of compassion and unconditional love"is now landing deep into matter. Over millions of years our souls have been slowly descending through the mental and astral planes down into the etheric planes. Finally we are beginning to fully touch down into the densest etheric, gaseous, liquid, and material planes.

This involutionary achievement was, it is sometimes suggested, made possible by the collaborative endeavor of the Buddha and Christ, the Buddha preparing the mental energy body of humanity as a whole for such a deep incarnation, and Christ penetrating deep through the emotional and physical realms. These two great beings were leaders of our flock.

According to this map, now that our souls have fully descended into matter through the involutionarly, process, they can now begin to ascend, as a whole, into a more graceful evolutionary cycle. This collective shift is a pivotal time for our planetary chain, the Solar Logos, and beyond.

Now —just to play devil's advocate for a moment—this is a really fabulous piece of anthropocentricity, isn't it? Just in case we humans are not pompous enough, this viewpoint asserts that humanity is pivotal in the evolutionary process of our solar and  galactic system and beyond! Hm. Such delusion. Such arrogance. 

So why do I believe it? For two reasons. 

The first is that this model explains to me the extraordinary experience of being human. Without exception every spiritual traveler that I know, including me, endures (and enjoys) the wildest and most paradoxical roller-coaster of a journey. Inside our minds, emotions, and psyches, we are all mood-swinging dramatists, one moment cosmic, divine, brilliant, and wise, and the next moment irritable, driven by uncontrollable mammalian instincts, defensive-aggressive, neurotic, and incredibly petty (Speak for yourself, I hear you say No, I reply, I speak for all of us!)

We are all of us strung out between cosmic consciousness and neurotic pettiness. What explains this extreme polarity? Our drama"our sacred drama"is, I believe, explained by our location in the scheme of things. We are central agents of transformation as spirit meets, marries, and revibrates matter, as involution turns to evolution. That is our essential esoteric function and purpose. We are the pivot where spirit meets and transforms matter. That is bound to create esoteric friction and "electric fire" playing out in and through us.

Then there is a second reason why I believe it, which points to something more easy, enjoyable, and graceful. Let me pose it first as an enquiry: How might you personally experience the full involutionary incarnation of your soul? What would it feel like when your spirit successfully incarnates into your matter? How would you recognize it?

The answer seems obvious to me, and it behooves us here to be kinesthetically and clairsentiently wise. As our souls ground fully into our bodies, down into our cellular and atomic matter, we would sense and feel the sensations of spirit, compassion, and unconditional love anchoring down into our vehicles. We would feel the incarnation of love in our bodies.

In my case, this is precisely the experience I have when I am in a state of graceful meditation. Perhaps for you too. This is also precisely the experience I have when I am centered, compassionate, and present. My mind and psyche are calm and watchful, whilst my body feels subtle sensations of well-being and goodwill.

I hear from my friends, colleagues, and students that they too have many similar experiences, some within meditation or other spiritual practices, but also in many other circumstances such being in a natural landscape, caring, healing, reading, making love, and participating in the arts, dance, sport, and so on. 

This is supremely and gracefully simple, isn't it? When spirit incarnates fully into matter"when love earths"of course we feel it as a deep and contented sensation in our physical bodies. Why should it not be that simple? The major cosmic narrative is that spirit is incarnating into matter. As it is above, so it is below. Our microcosms reflect the macrocosmic process. In his case, you and I are the space of encounter for both "above" and "below," and when it happens "below" we have love descending into the matter of our bodies, the soul fully entering its temple.

We can therefore see that a crucial part of our work as esotericists and travelers on the spiritual path is to land love into our bodies. It is no idle coincidence that at precisely the same time that meditation practices and Theosophical ideas began to emerge in Western culture, so also did the body-based approaches of yoga, martial arts, sacred dance, Tantra, breath work, and healing bodywork. In my own life, for example, I was very lucky when in my early thirties my oldest friend brought me over to California to experience deep tissue massage and healing hot springs. Initially my esoteric intellectuality was resistant, but my body opened up to receive my incarnation. I felt love and healing in my cells.

This was true incarnation. The altered states of consciousness and transcendent energies of my meditations were landing in my flesh and blood temple. I began experientially to understand incarnation and the involutionary cycle.

This embodiment must, I suggest, be a core part of the mature practice of a modern esotericist. Using whatever method and circumstances work best for you, come down into your body, sink into your flesh, relax, and allow your soul to find accommodation fully within you. Do this mindfully and with waking, expanding consciousness. You probably already do this very successfully when you are relaxed after a good meal or have walked and paused to enjoy a view. Your body is relaxed. You are naturally meditative. In those moments, you can just become more mindful and allow love and goodwill and compassion to sink into you. There is a wonderful simplicity here. The more we do it, the easier it becomes. But this requires self-management, discipline, and focus.

In all spiritual practices there is the consistent call to ground, earth, center, and embody. This is not just for stability and integration. It is also to allow the soul fully to inhabit its temple"your body. 

Imagine a society filled with people who have love anchored and radiating from their bodies"and are conscious and awake. That would be a new age.


WILLIAM BLOOM is a modern Western mystic and considered by many to be Britain's leading and most experienced mind-body-spirit teacher. He is the founder of Spiritual Companions. He cofounded and directed the famous Alternatives Program of St. James's Church, Piccadilly, London. For thirty years he was a senior faculty member of Europe's leading green and spiritual community, the Findhorn Foundation. He is the author of many books, including the influential The Endorphin Effect, Psychic Protection, and most recently The Power of the New Spirituality (Quest Books). His Web site is www.williambloom.com. This article originally appeared in the British Theosophical journal Esoterica


Subcategories